Anti-feminist guru Jordan Peterson shatters his own ‘academic’ credentials in one moronic Twitter post

Jordan Peterson
Avatar


Anti-feminist ‘guru’ Jordan Peterson shattered his own ‘academic’ credentials in one Twitter post on 19 August. The Toronto University psychology professor tweeted:

Related articles

Peterson has risen to global fame and fortune through using his academic standing to fuel right-leaning conspiracy theories. He calls white privilege a “Marxist lie”, Islamophobia “a word created by fascists… to manipulate morons”, and the history of the oppression of women an “appalling theory”.

The bestselling author uses many fields in an attempt to justify his views, including biological observations. But on Twitter, one user swiftly took apart Peterson’s latest notion on ants and Western capitalism:

‘Catiline’ points out that you can find anything in nature to prop up your ideology; whether that’s free-market capitalism or orgy-based stress relief.

Wrong on his own terms

Peterson messed up the job, though. Because his reading of the ant experiment itself was apparently wrong:

Co-author of the Georgia Institute of Technology study Dr Daria Monaenkova told BBC News:

The most active excavators were identified and then removed from the group. Surprisingly, several other group members took the place of the removed diggers. For us, this was a hint that unequal workload distribution may be beneficial for the excavating collectives.

In other words, the way ant colonies work is not about hierarchies. Studies suggest that ‘unemployed’ ants are the reserve labour force. As soon as researchers took the most active ants out, others who were not working took their place with the same skill and vigour.

The study Peterson cites also suggests that the number of ants working depends on the environment, rather than simply nature. Only the optimum level of ants will dig tunnels because if more joined in there would be blockages.

Humans, meanwhile, live in a world where 42 people own the same amount of wealth as half the planet. And systemic poverty, death, and preventable illness show that’s not beneficial for our ‘colony’.

So Peterson’s argument doesn’t even stand up on its own terms. And even if it did: why would we base our society on what a bunch of ants are doing?

Ridicule

On Twitter, the clinical psychologist faced a backlash:

https://twitter.com/mikeduncan/status/1031821137003601920

“The stupid man’s smart person”

Many people already seem to have Peterson sussed. Canadian columnist Tabatha Southey, for example, has branded Peterson “the stupid man’s smart person”, saying:

Peterson’s secret sauce is to provide an academic veneer to a lot of old-school rightwing cant, including the notion that most academia is corrupt and evil, and banal self-help patter… He’s very much a cult thing, in every regard. I think he’s a goof, which does not mean he’s not dangerous.

Peterson could well be dangerous: hundreds of thousands of people are buying his ‘academic’ repackaging of classic right-wing conspiracy theories and pseudo-scientific appeasement of racists. So we cannot simply laugh at his platform; even if Peterson can’t manage to weaponise the ‘appeal to nature’ fallacy without messing up the job.

Well, we can laugh and take action at the same time.

Get Involved!

– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.

Featured image via Gage Skidmore/ Flickr

Since you're here ...

We know you don't need a lecture. You wouldn't be here if you didn't care.
Now, more than ever, we need your help to challenge the rightwing press and hold power to account. Please help us survive and thrive.

The Canary Support

Comments are closed

Related articles