The BBC’s reaction to a ruling that it misled viewers shows why it cannot be trusted

Nick Robinson
Support us and go ad-free

On 1 July, Simon Maginn shared news that the BBC had upheld his complaint against Nick Robinson. In February, Robinson shared a tweet, on a BBC account, that made false accusations about disciplined Labour Party figures Chris Williamson and Jackie Walker. Yet, despite this ruling, nothing further has happened. The BBC, it seems, really cannot be trusted.

“Dear Mr Maginn”

Maginn’s complaint was based on a tweet Robinson made on 26 February. As the BBC noted, this “was posted on a BBC account and is considered part of BBC output”.

In the tweet, that’s still live at the time of writing, Robinson accused Williamson of screening a film “by a woman suspended from Labour for saying the Jews controlled the slave trade”.

Robinson was referring to the film WitchHunt. As Jewish Voice for Labour explained, this film explores the ongoing attacks “against the pro-Palestinian left, including its many Jewish members”. The film focuses on the treatment of Walker. She was suspended from the Labour Party amid what many people argue is an active witch-hunt to silence voices critical of Israel. Williamson planned to screen the film in parliament in March.

Maginn shared the BBC‘s response on Twitter. It suggested that Robinson’s accusation took Walker’s comments out of context. It also upheld Maginn’s complaint on the basis that although many tweets ‘compress’ information, Robinson’s:

paraphrase of Ms Walker gave an insufficiently accurate impression of her actual words

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free


Yet since this ruling, neither the BBC nor Robinson has issued any kind of formal apology to those involved. Robinson’s tweet is still live. Indeed, he shared the tweet again the next day, following Williamson’s suspension:

Many people have questioned the lack of apology and asked why Robinson’s statement wasn’t retracted:

As The Canary‘s Kerry-Anne Mendoza noted, perhaps the lack of apology is no surprise. Because “that’s how smear works”:

On 28 June, Labour removed its whip from Williamson. This followed a backlash after the party readmitted him following a formal warning on 26 June. Since then, the corporate media’s ongoing allegations of antisemitism against Jeremy Corbyn and many left-wing Labour members have spiralled.

When the BBC upheld this complaint, it showed just how many of these allegations are based on flimsy (at best) and inaccurate accusations. But the fact that despite this, there’s been no formal apology really does highlight that the supposedly impartial broadcaster can’t be trusted.

Featured image via YouTube – The Update

Support us and go ad-free

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop


The Canary Fund us
  • Show Comments
    1. I’m surprised they even acknowledged a complaint. during Corbyn’s election and then re election I wrote to the BBC on a number of occasions outlining bias against Corbyn. They didn’t answer any of the listed complaints I made, just repeated their mantra that the BBC is fair and unbiased. If only that were true. Prior to that I’d spent a lifetime watching BBC news because I thought that would be the best you could get. I would have been more impressed if they’d said they’d noted my complaints and would be careful in future, but no the bias, subliminal and more open, goes on.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.