London police face criticism and resistance over ‘heavy-handed’ ban on protests

Extinction Rebellion Policing
Support us and go ad-free

Police are facing growing criticism and resistance over a “heavy-handed” London-wide ban on climate crisis protests.

‘Police protecting the banks’

The Metropolitan Police imposed conditions under Section 14 of the Public Order Act 1986, requiring any protest assembly in the capital to cease by 9pm on Monday. It claimed this was to “prevent serious disruption to the life of the community”. As of 5pm on Monday, police said there had been 1,445 arrests in connection with the eight days of Extinction Rebellion (XR) climate protests in London. Officers also made more than 90 arrests on Monday as protesters targeted the City of London, the capital’s financial district. Police moved in to clear Trafalgar Square on Monday evening, telling protesters to leave the site by 9pm or risk arrest.

Some highlighted the significance of police making their move as activists set their sights on “the centres of power and capital”:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

On Tuesday, Metropolitan Police deputy assistant commissioner Laurence Taylor argued that the protest ban was “entirely proportionate and reasonable”. He also said that using section 14 to limit the location and duration of protest action was “not unusual at all”, and that the measures had been applied during demonstrations over the jailing of far-right figure Stephen Yaxley-Lennon (aka Tommy Robinson) in August.

This highly controversial comparison to one side, the Network for Police Monitoring (Netpol) highlighted that the police were specifically targeting XR:

The group also highlighted inappropriate police practices:

“Extremely worrying”

Shadow home secretary Diane Abbott said: “This ban is completely contrary to Britain’s long-held traditions of policing by consent, freedom of speech, and the right to protest.” Shadow policing and crime minister Louise Haigh, meanwhile, stated: “This is a grotesque overreaction and extremely worrying attack on basic civil liberties.” Others also spoke out:

On Twitter, XR’s London branch labelled the clearing of protesters from the square as “an outrage”. It also tweeted: “Today, an unprecedented, political, decision has been taken to shut down peaceful protest calling out the government for inaction in the face of crisis.”

‘Invalid overreach’

Barrister Jo Maugham QC also spoke out, tweeting:

Human rights lawyer Adam Wagner, meanwhile, called the move “draconian and extremely heavy-handed”. He tweeted: “We have a right to free speech under article 10 and to free assembly under article 11 of the (annex to the) Human Rights Act. These can only be interfered with if the interference is lawful and proportionate. I think the police may have gone too far here.”

Allan Hogarth, head of advocacy and programmes at Amnesty International UK, said: “Imposing a blanket ban on Extinction Rebellion protests is an unlawful restriction on the rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly… This is a heavy-handed and unacceptable move by the Metropolitan Police. Certain disruption to ordinary life for protesting is natural, and it needs to be tolerated.”

It also seems that activists are already considering legal action:


XR protests, meanwhile, are continuing in London despite police ordering activists to end their gatherings across the capital or risk arrest. On Tuesday morning, for example, XR co-founder Gail Bradbrook was filmed climbing the entrance to the Department for Transport in Westminster. Other protesters had glued themselves to the building.

Meanwhile, police dealt with a road block near Baker Street and told a number of protesters camped in Vauxhall Pleasure Gardens to move on or risk arrest. Activists were also seen gathering at Millbank and planned a rally back at Trafalgar Square at midday.

Under the current order, any assembly – classed as a gathering of two or more people – linked to Extinction Rebellion in London is unlawful. But with critics speaking loudly and clearly against the move, that may not be the case for long.

Featured image and additional content via Press Association

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us