DWP faces yet another Universal Credit investigation

The DWP logo and Therese Coffey - a Universal Credit probe
Support us and go ad-free

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is under the microscope again. Once more, it’s over the contentious benefit Universal Credit. But this consultation could be game-changing. Because the organisation doing it wants claimants to share their experiences.

The DWP: “Universal Discredit”?

Universal Credit is the DWP’s flagship welfare policy. But it’s in constant chaos, from taking Greggs’ staff bonuses to the DWP not knowing if it causes poverty. The issues with the benefit led UN special rapporteur on extreme poverty Philip Alston to call it “Universal Discredit”.

Recently, the Economic Affairs Committee said it was doing an investigation into Universal Credit. It wanted claimants to email it with their stories. But now, the National Audit Office (NAO) is getting involved. And potentially, every claimant in the UK could have their say.

Another Universal Credit probe

The NAO want people to complete a survey on the benefit. It’s doing a consultation:

As the NAO wrote:

This consultation is aimed at organisations who represent or provide services to the UC claimants, and individual members of the public with experience of claiming UC.

We will use the information gathered to help us understand the perspectives of claimants and organisations that support them.

It is specifically looking into the five-week wait for a first payment. It’s no shock that the NAO is doing this. Because the five-week wait has been marred by scandal.

Repeated scandal

The Trussell Trust has been critical of how the DWP makes claimants wait for their first payment. It noted:

a 52% average increase in food bank use in areas that have had Universal Credit for at least 12 months compared to 13% in areas that have not.

But it went further, saying that:

the five week wait is one of the key reasons why we’ve seen a rise in people needing food banks where it has been rolled out.

Moreover, in 2018 the NAO previously looked at the five-week wait. It said:

nearly 60% of new claimants (around 56,000 a month) receive a Universal Credit advance to help them manage before receiving their first payment.

And that’s just the tip of the iceberg.

Utter chaos

The Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) estimates that, under Universal Credit:

5.1 million people in working families are expected to see a reduction in income.

It also says that:

1.7 million people living in poverty in working families… face a substantial reduction in income, on average £2,500 a year.

And, as BBC News reported, by August 2019 54% of landlords had seen tenants on the benefit fall into arrears in the last year. As The Canary‘s Fréa Lockley reported, the benefit could well be driving rising homelessness.

So, the NAO’s new probe into Universal Credit may throw up some telling results.

A welcome move?

Campaign group BENEFITS NEWS welcomed the NAO survey:

But will the DWP listen? Possibly not, as it already knows that Universal Credit is causing severe hardship. As The Canary reported in 2018, its own survey of claimants found that only 25% of them said they were “keeping up with bills… without any difficulties”. In total, 72% either struggled from “time to time”, struggled constantly, fell behind, or were having “real financial difficulties”.

So, it remains to be seen what impact the NAO’s probe will have. But any chance for claimants to have their voices heard is a good thing. And the more pressure people and organisations apply to the DWP, the better.

Featured image via the Oxford Union – YouTube and Wikimedia

Support us and go ad-free

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us