Independent Media | Campaigning Journalism
MP makes shocking PPE revelation that the government won’t want you to hear
On 21 April, Labour MP Bill Esterson made a shocking revelation about personal protective equipment (PPE). And it seems to represent one more brick in the wall of evidence showing government incompetence and inaction amid the coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic.
PPE scandal
Esterson tweeted:
One of my constituents offered to make 10 million masks on 27 March and has never had a reply. I wrote to the government and also have not had a reply. This is putting lives at risk. It is shambolic. It needs to be fixed.
— Bill Esterson (@Bill_Esterson) April 21, 2020
Read on...
The NHS has been struggling so far with a lack of PPE. And despite grave warnings about the danger to staff from such a shortage, government action has been slow. Numerous UK manufacturers, for example, have reportedly faced the same situation as Esterson’s constituent, with the government failing to respond to PPE offers. Many, meanwhile, have reacted to this reality by sending PPE to other countries in Europe instead.
The government is also facing scrutiny over a recent PPE order from Turkey. Because there are allegations that it only placed the order after saying the PPE was already on its way (and it has still not arrived).
On 21 April, the Trades Union Congress (TUC) called for an independent public inquiry into the “grotesque” shortage of PPE by the end of the year. This comes as at least 100 workers in the health service have died after contracting coronavirus.
Our NHS, social care and key workers deserve better.
Well said @FrancesOGrady #PPE https://t.co/JFTppp6f1i
— Jeremy Corbyn (@jeremycorbyn) April 21, 2020
Testing too…
The same situation was apparently true with testing too. Because experts who offered help to the government on this front also waited weeks for a response. And testing rates are still shockingly low. The government has promised 100,000 tests a day by the end of April, but there were only around 20,000 done between 19 April and 20 April, although capacity is greater.
Downing Street sources tell the Telegraph that Matt Hancock's promise of 100,000 coronavirus tests a day was “irrational” and “arbitrary” and will “come back to bite him.”
In other news, here’s Johnson this time last month. pic.twitter.com/XdMvNCRp8T
— Adam Bienkov (@AdamBienkov) April 21, 2020
Meanwhile, the quality of the tests that have existed has come into question:
Exclusive: Govt knew 1 in 4 #C19 test kits potentially faulty. One leading epidemiologist described it is a “catastrophe”. It means those given a virus-free status in error since testing first began two months ago would not have known they were infected https://t.co/Cto575vBIc
— Clive Lewis MP (@labourlewis) April 21, 2020
At least 17,337 people have died so far in the UK during the coronavirus outbreak. And with the government reporting “hospital-only figures”, the real number of fatalities is likely to be much higher – especially as a result of care home deaths.
France includes Coronavirus deaths in care homes in its daily figures. The UK doesn't.
We need to start doing this ASAP.
We have to know what's going on in care homes if we are to do all we can to help save lives.
— Richard Burgon MP (@RichardBurgon) April 21, 2020
Government trying to control the narrative
Amid these government failings, health workers are reportedly having to resist attempted censorship:
We won’t be silenced.
NHS staff told not to tweet about 'political issues like lack of PPE' https://t.co/Z7q4sLw5c6
— Dr Alex Gates (@dr_alex_gates) April 20, 2020
There is also ongoing work on allegations, which the Department of Health and Social Care is vigorously denying, of ‘fake NHS staff accounts’ putting out pro-government propaganda.
Keep. Holding. Them. To. Account.
Some experts have called the government’s response to the coronavirus pandemic a “national scandal”. But the scandal hasn’t just been in recent weeks. It’s been years in the making. Because Boris Johnson’s party has decimated the NHS in the last decade via its ideological austerity policies. And in doing so, it has left the service struggling to cope with this pandemic:
1) UK governments had known for nearly two decades that pandemic was the No 1 threat facing the country. But Tory austerity policies progressively undercut the resources needed to cope
— Jonathan Cook (@Jonathan_K_Cook) April 19, 2020
8) A Health Department insider: ‘A pandemic was always at the top of our national risk register – always – but when it came we just slowly watched. We could have been Germany but instead we were doomed by our incompetence, our hubris and our austerity’
— Jonathan Cook (@Jonathan_K_Cook) April 19, 2020
The former Chief Scientific Adviser, Professor Sir David King, argues that austerity and Number 10’s communications policies have hindered the UK’s reaction to the pandemic. pic.twitter.com/Gvbw042Rpd
— Channel 4 News (@Channel4News) April 20, 2020
Much of Britain’s corporate media, meanwhile, has put out pro-government propaganda, criticising people who dare to call out the government’s incompetent response. Former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, for example, faced much hostility for holding Johnson’s team to account in real time. He was right to do so. But as some have pointed out, the decks have long been stacked in favour of the Tories and against progressives:
The Sunday Times report ought to be the end of Johnson, but it won't be. Windrush, Grenfell, Cambridge Analytica, the failure of post-crash austerity – all should have locked the Tories out of power.
Media bias, FPTP and imperial nostagia make Britain very, very hard to change.
— Michael Chessum (@michael_chessum) April 19, 2020
Anybody who thinks this country isn’t some sort of weird dictatorship needs to ask themselves this question. Without prejudice
If Corbyn has missed 5 Cobra meetings that had resulted in lots of deaths. What would the reaction be on the BBC and in the papers ?
— Reverend&TheMakers 💙 (@Reverend_Makers) April 19, 2020
Today, it’s perhaps more important than ever to hold the government to account. Because its response has been appalling. And we need to demand better. Lives depend on it.
Featured image via YouTube – ITV News / YouTube – BBC News
Fund our Investigations Unit
You can help us investigate corruption, expose injustice and uncover the truth.
As one of the only independent investigations units in the country, we work for you – but we need your help to keep going. We need to raise £10,000 to continue our groundbreaking investigations. Can you chip in?
Fund us -
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
Bogus Johnson is as big a bloody liar as Tony B’Liar. He says the first thing that comes out of his head but it may have been regurgitated from below his fat belt. It’s clear the Tories can’t organize a piss up in a brewery.
It is becoming increasingly apparent that government inaction over PPE and, far worse, deliberate obfuscation for political expediency, amounts to criminal negligence. The author Philip Pullman has called, in an essay for Penguin, for the front bench to be charged with conspiracy to murder if it is established that offers of EU help over PPE supplies were rejected for political reasons, as Sir Simon McDonald, the most senior civil servant at the Foreign Office, has finally admitted, contradicting his own and the government’s statements on the issue. This will undoubtedly have led to deaths, which those politicians responsible undoubtedly knew at the time of taking their decision. There is no good reason which justifies turning down access to supplies under the present crisis. It was done to preserve the government’s profile over Brexit, and it is profoundly shocking. This wretch from the Foreign Office is smirking throughout his admission. I hope it’s from embarrassment. Who are these appalling people?
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/coronavirus-uk-eu-medical-equipment-ventilators-boris-johnson-brexit-latest-a9476811.html
Apologies. He initially told MPs that ministers had been briefed by the UK’s mission to the EU on “what was on offer” from Brussels, and then backtracked in a letter afterwards: ““Unfortunately, due to a misunderstanding, I inadvertently and wrongly told the committee, that ministers were briefed by UKMIS on the EU’s joint procurement scheme and took a political decision not to participate in it. This is incorrect. Ministers were not briefed by our mission in Brussels about the scheme and a political decision was not taken on whether or not to participate.” That has to be one of the most unconvincing retractions I’ve ever heard. Isn’t it reassuring that our most senior civil servants know exactly what they’re talking about at time like this ….