Labour’s response to the attack on two of its Black female MPs is a f**king disgrace
The Board of Deputies of British Jews (BoD) has called for the Labour Party to take “swift and decisive action” against two of its Black female MPs. The BoD’s gripe with the MPs in question – Diane Abbott and Bell Ribeiro-Addy – is that they appeared at a Zoom meeting where suspended Labour members were in attendance.
On 1 May, the Labour Party’s shadow home secretary explained what ‘decisive action’ the party has now taken on BBC Radio 4‘s Today programme. Suffice to say, it’s a fucking disgrace.
Wrong. And wrong.
BoD president Marie van der Zyl said of the Zoom meeting, which the group ‘Don’t Leave, Organise’ arranged:
As soon as we learnt about this we raised it with Keir Starmer’s office and with the Labour whips.
It is completely unacceptable that Labour MPs, and even ordinary members, should be sharing platforms with those that have been expelled from the Party for antisemitism.
There are numerous issues with this statement. Firstly, attending a Zoom meeting doesn’t necessarily put anyone on its ‘platform’. Hundreds of people can dial in to such meetings, but they don’t automatically get a ‘platform’ on the event.
Secondly, the BoD president claimed people on the ‘platform’ were “expelled from the Party for antisemitism”. Both the Jewish Chronicle and Politics Home named activist and writer Jackie Walker and Tony Greenstein – both Jewish – as attendees of note regarding the BoD complaint. But as Walker noted:
Dear @BoardofDeputies neither I nor Tony Greenstein, who are both Jewish, were expelled for antisemitism
— Jackie walker (@Jackiew80333500) April 30, 2020
I believe Marie is mistaken … none of the people who spoke were expelled for racism https://t.co/tKLNbswxfP
— Jackie walker (@Jackiew80333500) April 30, 2020
Worse and worse
Now, Labour has revealed what ‘decisive action’ it’s taken against the MPs in question. Speaking on the Today programme, shadow home secretary Nick Thomas-Symonds said:
they’ve been spoken to, I understand, very firmly about this… I think that the leader of the party was right to do that and to remind both the MPs of their responsibilities, and clearly no Labour MP should be sharing any platform with people who have been expelled from the party.
As people pointed out, Labour’s effective response then was to treat the MPs like schoolchildren who warranted a ticking off:
#r4today did I really hear the new Shadow Home Secretary (who?) saying confidently that Diane Abbott had been "spoken to firmly"? Because of the BoD presumably? Diane Abbott, treated like an errant schoolgirl? #WTAF
(If I misheard I apologise, of course)
— LadyDevushkaSW#NHS#GTTO#FreeNazanin🤚 (@irisstylosa) May 1, 2020
Meanwhile, some wondered whether the ‘no sharing a platform’ rule will be extended to all previously expelled members of the party:
Just listened back on i-player and he did say it. Also said that sharing a platform with people expelled from the party is not acceptable and that’s been made clear to them. So next time a RW Labour MP appears on the same show as Alistair Campbell, we’ll know what to do 🤬
— Queen of Scotties #SocialistCampaignGroup (@RedWoman1552) May 1, 2020
Others also noted the disconnect between the BoD’s call for swift action against the two MPs and its apparent inaction on a recent report that identified people in the party who were “responsible for the failures in handling antisemitism complaints”:
but no need for 'swift and decisive action' to deal with the people we now know were actually responsible for the failures in handling antisemitism complaints, some of whom are still on the party's payroll.
this tragicomic shit show just goes on and on… https://t.co/XEsrAOso3M
— Justin Schlosberg (@jrschlosberg) April 30, 2020
Anti-Black racism and misogynoir
The leaked Labour report exposed “anti-Black racism” within the party. And it hasn’t gone unnoticed that, in its complaint, the BoD criticised Black Labour MPs who are women:
If you want to start this unesscessary war, when some of your supposed “allies”, those RACIST Labour HQ staff, are STILL in post.
You can give it try it.
Setting up and targeting Black women MPs who are already targets. Disgusting!!
— Chardine Taylor Stone (@misschazmatazz) April 30, 2020
Board Of Deputies when Rachel Reeves paid a lengthy tribute to rabid Anti-Semite Nancy Astor: 🔇
Board Of Deputies when Diane Abbott has a zoom conference: “SHE MUST BE EXPELLED”
Got tired of their shit years ago
— Ben (@BenJolly9) April 30, 2020
In other words, the Board of Deputies want Keir Starmer to prove how "anti-racist" the Labour Party is by suspending two black female Labour MPs for holding a Zoom meeting with socialist Jews. If it wasn't so serious, it would be funny. https://t.co/t3JOyu33Js
— Frank Owen's Legendary Paintbrush (@WarmongerHodges) April 30, 2020
Full solidarity with @HackneyAbbott and @BellRibeiroAddy
Anyone calling for their suspension or not giving them their full support in the wake of this ridiculous attack is not serious about anti racism. Truly appalling.
— Universal Basic Income Now, Fuckers! (@holski_beat) April 30, 2020
You put two black women and three Jews in your sights. That looks like a full house. https://t.co/Ulm1ZZDcNM
— JewishVoiceForLabour (@JVoiceLabour) April 30, 2020
But rather than showing solidarity with the party’s Black female MPs, and calling out this cynical attack for what it was, the current Labour leadership near instantly gave the MPs a scolding. As The Canary‘s Kerry-Anne Mendoza pointed out, this was the new leadership’s “first showdown” with the sort of antisemitism smears against the party that were a constant during Jeremy Corbyn’s tenure.
Starmer’s leadership team failed these Black female MPs, badly. What a fucking disgrace.
Featured image via ITV News/YouTube, Sky News/YouTube and BoardofDeputiesPR/Wikimedia
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
Leave a ReplyYou must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversation
Please read our comment moderation policy here.