Richard Burgon has a plan for the ‘super-rich’

Richard Burgon
Support us and go ad-free

Labour MP Richard Burgon is asking people to sign a petition, which he’ll later present to parliament. And given the subject matter, there’s no reason for most people not to get involved. Because Burgon wants to properly tax the “super-rich”.

Burgon is back

The former shadow justice minister under Jeremy Corbyn is not messing about. As he tweeted:


He’s doing it with the group Labour Assembly Against Austerity. The petition says on its website:

We call on the House of Commons to introduce higher taxes on the super-rich as a step to tackling the widespread poverty and inequality that scar our society.

This crisis has not only shone a spotlight on the huge inequalities in our society – it has deepened them.

Indeed. Because since the coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic, the situation for millions of people in the UK has become even more desperate.

The pandemic: chaos for some, a money-spinner for others

As The Canary has documented, inequality and poverty have got worse since March last year. For example:

  • The number of households living in destitution more than doubled in 2020.
  • A parliamentary report suggested more people died of coronavirus and suffered unnecessarily during the pandemic due to historical Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) cuts.
  • People using foodbanks rose even more; 33% for the Trussell Trust alone.

But the story wasn’t the same for everyone. For example:

  • The number of UK billionaires increased by 24%. Their wealth increased by 21% – collectively to over half a trillion pounds.
  • House prices increased by 13.4% – the largest rise since 2004.
  • Average FTSE 100 CEOs had already earned the median UK wage within the first 34 hours of the working year.

The chasm between the lives of the rich and the poor was already wide. Now, the pandemic has created a gulf. So, Burgon has three ways to begin addressing this.

Starting conversations

As the petition states, he’s calling for:

A Wealth Tax that would raise tens of billions from the wealthiest in our society.

A Windfall Tax on those corporations that have made super-profits during this crisis.

A More progressive income tax system including a new 55% income tax rate on all income over £200,000 per year; a 50% income tax rate for those on over £123,000 and 45% rate for income over £80,000.

It remains to be seen how far Burgon’s plans will go in parliament. The Labour Party is unlikely to support them. The Tories certainly won’t. What Burgon is doing, however, is starting a conversation around the gaping inequality that plagues our society. And any increase in awareness and conversations around this issue can only be a good thing. So, get involved – you can sign the petition here.

Featured image via Rwendland – Wikimedia

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. We used to have a wealth tax in this country, it was called “The Rates”; it was the fairest tax ever invented. It was an annual tax based on the value of houses levied on the owners, NOT the tenants. The rich hated it , because they could fool the taxman into thinking they had no income, but they couldn’t hide their mansions! And anyone who was “property-rich, cash-poor” could always get rebates; old-age pensioners getting the state old-age pension got an automatic 100% rebate so they paid nothing! Patrick Jenkin’s (takes out onion) “poor old lady living alone but paying as much as the family with four strapping men all in work” did NOT exist! Personally, I think the best plan for the rich is “Up against the wall motherfucker!”

      1. I remember those days of the Rates, just such a wonderfully simple tax to understand.. The larger your house, the more you had to pay. I remember those Poll Tax riots too when Mrs Thatcher introduced the Poll Tax.
        I would support your plan for the super rich too. There is far too much Greed and Selfishness under the Tories. Up against the wall, I will load the bullets, you fire. Then we can divvy up the money. Plenty of money for the kiddies dinners, sorted!

    2. Yes the Rates were a progressive tax; they were replaced by Council Tax, the level of which is determined by, er, the rateable value of each property. It remains a progressive tax. Those dastardly rich people still can’t hide their ‘mansions’ from the taxman.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.