The Met decision not to investigate the Downing Street party has confused and angered people
Police won’t investigate the party which allegedly took place at No 10 in December 2020. The lockdown soiree is causing a major headache for Tories because it would have breached coronavirus (Covid-19) rules in place at the time. This was also a time when millions of people sacrificed time with family and were restricted from attending funerals to follow lockdown rules and protect the NHS.
Already senior communications advisor Allegra Stratton has resigned over the row. PM Boris Johnson is also under pressure to go. Yet the police won’t touch it. They say they don’t do retrospective investigations in cases of this kind. And now people are questioning the very concepts of crime and time.
All crime matters
Angry citizens have been airing their concerns on social media. A Twitter user called Foxy got straight to the point. Because, until time travel is invented, all investigations are retrospective:
All crime is retrospective you kippers https://t.co/RWRCjtUKMM pic.twitter.com/W75eGWDtPv
— Foxy 🇿🇲 (@FplFoxy) December 9, 2021
Another Twitter user, Roger Call, raised more bread and butter concerns in quite a sarcastic and satirical manner:
My plumber tells me that they don't investigate retrospective leaks.😉 pic.twitter.com/YQy6Yrt6Ze
— Roger Gall (@Shambles151) December 8, 2021
This other contributor responded with a timely meme of Met chief Cressida Dick as a clairvoyant:
This will be their strategy from now on: pic.twitter.com/Ppcb432KTL
— Brigitte #FreeNazanin #JohnsonOut 🇩🇪🇬🇧🇪🇺 (@Brigitt49577118) December 8, 2021
Twitter user Hira pondered how frustrating it must be for cops to never be able to investigate crime that has already happened:
the met when they’re 5 seconds late to a crime scene and it’s now retrospective pic.twitter.com/IdAaBmiPpJ
— Hira 🦋 (@hirimonsta) December 8, 2021
While this Twitter user offered some practical advice: if arrested, just point out that your crime had happened at some point in the past and therefore can’t be investigated:
anyone who gets arrested just say u can’t be charged cos it’s retrospective then????? https://t.co/W70fnhzaxI
— conor (average max bird enjoyer) (@reaIgone) December 9, 2021
Sky‘s Beth Rigby tweeted the Met’s full statement about investigations – or lack of them.
NEW: Statement from the Met. No investigation. ‘Based on the absence of evidence and in line with our policy of not investigating retrospective breaches of regs Met will not commence investigation at this time’ pic.twitter.com/3a4C9W0yqT
— Beth Rigby (@BethRigby) December 8, 2021
Rigby’s tweet is itself slightly ironic. The journalist was taken off air last year for attending a party in breach of coronavirus rules.
The sacrifices people made
As the latest scandal has played out, many people have come forward to talk about the sacrifices they made during the 2020 Christmas lockdown. People like Rosie, who had a child during the restrictions:
My heart is breaking for those who lost loved ones. Reminded of the sacrifices I made in lockdown with a newborn, family not meeting her for 6 months, for my colleagues & our NHS. This is just so awful. pic.twitter.com/iAhnKrabz2
— Rosie Drage 🌈 (She/Her) (@rosiedrage1) December 8, 2021
Twitter user Kojo Richmond said that there was no way the breach should go unpunished after what regular people had to endure:
Ok. Boris next, this isn’t done. Full police investigation needed and heads need to roll. People made unimaginable sacrifices to abide by lockdown rules. You don’t get to mock that and get away with it. https://t.co/5Vhr2oy2dj
— Kojo (@KojoRichmond_) December 8, 2021
Rebecca Fewtrell tweeted about her anger at the government. Her 38 year old husband had passed away before Christmas. She and her young child were left to deal with their grief in an isolating lockdown.
Last Christmas was the first since my 3 year old & I lost his daddy and my 38 yo husband.
That, and the lockdown & tier rules were absolutely brutal. I thought I would break. I’m still affected by that isolation.
I didn’t think I could hate this Gov more.
So, so angry!
— Rebecca Fewtrell (@RFewtrellUK) December 8, 2021
We know it’s always been one rule for the ruling class and another for us. But never has that fact been as stark as this week amid the new revelations. While Britain suffered, the Tories appear to have flouted the rules they themselves imposed. And that needs to be dealt with.
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
I agree with brycewilby, but am also adding that if not that, then everyone who was fined for breaching covid rules should be re-imbursed, and the police arresting or fining them should themselves be fined/arrested for fining and arresting people, along with the judges who agreed with letting off the elites, for operating a ‘them and us’ legal system, and refusing to bring criminals to justice because of thier staus, money, and power.
None of us should obey any laws that the elites of this world don’t obey, and none of us should be fined or punished for copying the elites in their criminality. They are supposed to lead by example, not ‘do as we say, not as we do’. If they want law to be of any value to anyone, they MUST lead by example, or be MADE an example of.
These politicians are the vilest creatures on the planet, they are not there to help us or the nation, they are there to help themselves, and all claims to the contrary are false and extremely cognitively dissonant. History speaks loudly that they are nothing more than fakely-elected criminals, and the Police are nothing more than their uniformed thugs and criminal-protecting policy enforcers.
Leave a ReplyYou must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversation
Please read our comment moderation policy here.