George W. Bush's gaffe shows war crimes are a parlour joke for the ruling class

George W. Bush’s gaffe shows war crimes are a parlour joke for the ruling class

Nineteen years on, the Iraq War has become a parlour joke for rich Western audiences, a parlour joke cracked by no less than the architect of Iraq’s destruction, George W. Bush. That the ex-president was speaking at an event at a venue named after himself, the George W. Bush Presidential Centre, only adds to the crassness.

Bush was there to discuss future elections in the US. But he was criticising the Russian invasion of Ukraine when he said:

…the decision of one man to launch a wholly unjustified and brutal invasion of Iraq. I mean of Ukraine.

When he laughed it off, audience members laughed with him. Bush blamed his age – he is 75 – for the error.

Former President George W. Bush: “The decision of one man to launch a wholly unjustified and brutal invasion of Iraq. I mean of Ukraine.” pic.twitter.com/UMwNMwMnmX

— Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) May 19, 2022

War crimes

Bush’s gaffe drew immediate criticism on social media, including from Mehdi Hasan:

"I'm not laughing & I am guessing nor are the families of the 1000s of American troops & the 100s of 1000s of Iraqis who died in that war."

My response to George W. Bush's bizarre Freudian slip, confusing Ukraine & Iraq, while hosting #MSNBCPrime tonight:pic.twitter.com/tijp5QVvWY

— Mehdi Hasan (@mehdirhasan) May 19, 2022

Media Lens said Bush’s error showed up the mendacity and hypocrisy of Western media as a whole:

In a single moment of unconscious dissent, the hypocrisy and mendacity of the entire Western propaganda system is exposed.

Bush on 'the decision of one man to launch a wholly unjustified and brutal invasion of Iraq… I mean Ukraine.'https://t.co/h1oIootAWJ

— Media Lens (@medialens) May 19, 2022

Bush also accused Putin of rigging elections. However, it was quickly pointed out that similar accusations have been made of Bush himself, regarding his 2000 election:

George W. Bush, who stole the 2000 election, decries Russian elections for being "rigged," then goes on to denounce Vladimir Putin for "launch[ing] a wholly unjustified invasion of Iraq — I mean of Ukraine."pic.twitter.com/ZnTIwQzQQo

— Alex Rubinstein (@RealAlexRubi) May 19, 2022

Another commenter had to explain to her father that Bush, who is famous for his blunders, somehow got into a top US university:

https://twitter.com/varsha_venkat_/status/1527140485831094272

One journalist made it very clear that he felt there was little difference between what Bush did in Iraq and what Putin has done in Ukraine:

What George W. Bush did to Iraq was every bit as evil as what Vladimir Putin is doing to Ukraine. We have zero moral high ground. Zero.

— Scott Morefield (@SKMorefield) May 19, 2022

‘Twice as brutal’

Meanwhile, another said that in terms of sheer death toll in the first three months, Bush’s Iraq war was far more bloody than the Ukraine invasion:

Glad George Bush finally admits this! While we’re here, in first 3 months of Iraq Invasion, 8000 Iraqi civilians were killed, double # of Ukraine civilians after 3 months. Statistically speaking, Bush was twice as brutal. https://t.co/sZsmArMQA0

— #StopCopCity (@ChuckModi1) May 19, 2022

And one Twitter user captured the essence of the problem when he said that war criminality is “ok when we do it”:

George W. Bush openly admitting that he views the invasion of Iraq as on par with Russia's invasion of Ukraine reveals what we've always known about US foreign policy: "it's ok when we do it." Nice to hear someone finally just admit it.

— Sailor Moon (@stealyoredbull) May 19, 2022

Accountability

Bush’s latest error comes at a key moment in terms of accountability. In recent days, the first trials of Russian troops for war crimes in Ukraine have gotten underway. The first accused soldier pleaded guilty in a Kyiv court on Wednesday.

Closer to home, an amnesty on crimes by British troops during the Troubles in Ireland has become law.

Republic of Ireland prime minister Michael Martin told the press on Tuesday 17th May:

Victims and survivors want no amnesty. They want full accountability. They want people brought before the courts if possible and they want people prosecuted. That’s the least they deserve.

If there was ever any doubt about a moral double standard over war crimes, it surely must now be dispelled. As it stands, British and American brutality can be legislated away or simply laughed off, whilst at the same time war crime trials in Ukraine are treated with grave seriousness.

The truth is, all war crime allegations must be given the same gravity, and the law should not respect wealth, fame, or power.

Featured image via Wikimedia Common/Chris Greenberg, cropped to 770 x 403.

Comments 1

Frank Sterle Jr. says:

4 years ago

Bush had strong influencers in his inner circle, notably insidious-control-man VP Dick Cheney. … I view such figureheads as U.S. presidents and Canadian prime ministers as being mostly symbolically ‘in charge’, beneath the most power-entrenched and saturated national/corporate interests and institutions. The elected heads ‘lead’ a virtual corpocracy, i.e. “a society dominated by politically and economically large corporations”.

Powerful business interests can debilitate high-level elected officials through implicit or explicit threats to transfer or eliminate jobs and capital investment, thus economic stability, if corporate ‘requests’ aren’t accommodated. (Does Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s SNC-Lavalin affair/corruption come to mind?) It’s a political crippling that’s worsened by a blaring mainstream news-media that are permitted to be naturally critical of incumbent governments, especially in regards to job and capital transfers and economic weakening.

Also, every nation and culture has its own propaganda and core beliefs, true and false; though some culture/nations — usually the biggest, most powerful — are much more corrupt and brutal than the smaller, weaker ones. And western mainstream news-media are a significant part of this moral problem. Yet, the editors/journalists likely sleep well at night, nonetheless. One can still hear or read praise, or conservatives’ scorn, heaped upon The New York Times for their supposed uncompromised integrity when it comes to humanitarianism and ethical journalism.

Yet, did they not help create the Iraq War, through then-U.S.-VP Dick Cheney’s self-citing via The Times’ website? That would be the same Cheney who monetarily benefitted from the war via Iraqi oil fields — a war I consider to have been much more like a turkey shoot, considering the massive military might attacking the relatively weak country. I recall reading that The Times had essentially claimed honest-ignorance innocence on the grounds that it was its blogger’s overzealousness that was/is at fault. But is it really plausible that The Times did/does not insist upon securing the non-publishable yet accurate identity of its writers’ anonymous information sources — in this case, a devious Cheney — especially considering that Cheney himself would then use that anonymous source’s (i.e. his own) total BS about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction to justify a declaration of war that inevitably resulted in genuine gratuitous mass suffering and slaughter, both abroad and domestically?