Iain Duncan Smith, the architect of austerity in the Department of Work and Pensions, has stated that he believes his ambitions to lead the country were thwarted by the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11 2001.
Speaking at a fringe event at the Conservative party conference in Manchester this week, he said:
“The day before I got elected the twin towers were struck. So first of all we got no lift on my announcement. It had to be buried the following day, hardly anybody was paying attention.
“The following day I appeared for the statement in the House, straight in. I didn’t sleep that night, had to sort out shadow cabinet positions, got them all done, got in there and we were straight in.”
“When the nation is at war there is only one person [the public] look to. It is the prime minister because the prime minister is powerful. He is the one that directs it and Blair of course milked that for all it was worth. It was impossible for weeks and months to get anywhere near any domestic debate.. it is very difficult to make headway as leader of the opposition unless you have the playing field to fight on and that is domestic policy.”
For those who are not aware, Iain Duncan Smith spent a fairly disastrous few years as leader of the Conservative Party during the premiership of Tony Blair. He is largely considered the worst Conservative leader of all time, and that includes the shambles of William Hague’s ’24 hours to save the pound’ bus tour. He took over as leader following Hague’s defeat in the 2001 general election, and ran the party for just two years before being ousted in a Vote of No Confidence in October 2003.
As you can see in the video below, the reason IDS was ousted from his leadership and failed to become PM had nothing to do with terrorist attacks anywhere in the world. Instead, it was down to the fact that he is well to the right of much of the Tory party, let alone the public.
There are plenty of other reasons IDS will never be Prime Minister – but key among them is his sheer unlikability. He is a man who seems to ooze contempt from every pore, and have very few redeeming features. He also seems quite content to enjoy the largesse of the taxpayer and his father-in-law rather a lot for a man who claims to be opposed to ‘something for nothing’ culture:
- In the Betsy Gate scandal of 2001, it was revealed that the tax payer began paying £15,000 a year for Mr Duncan Smith’s wife to become his ‘diary secretary’.
- He once charged the taxpayer £39 expenses to cover just one breakfast.
- Mr Duncan Smith currently costs the tax payer a whopping £134, 565 in salary and expenses.
- He also has no worries about meeting his housing costs as those hit by the bedroom tax as he lives rent free in a £2 million mansion owned by his aristocrat father-in-law.
This behaviour is made all the more contemptible in light of the bitter cuts Iain Duncan Smith has made to lifelines supporting the most vulnerable members of UK society. This string of cuts to wages and welfare have resulted in some dire outcomes. To name just three:
- According to a recent survey, 913,138 were forced to turn to The Trussell Trust for emergency food aid last year – three times the 346,992 requiring such help the previous year. More than 330,000 of these emergency parcels went to children
- Statutory Homelessness  rose by 21% in England and 17% in Wales in 2012. While Rough Sleeping has risen even faster, at 31% in England. Outreach workers from Homeless Charity Crisis performed a count in London which found a 62% rise in rough sleepers in the capital in just the last two years .
- 1 in 6 British pensioners now live in poverty, and 24,000 will die this winter because they cannot afford to heat their homes.
Iain Duncan Smith is the poster boy for bogus austerity – a mindset that endorses poverty for the many to ensure patronage for the few. Mr Duncan Smith, there are many reasons why you are not Prime Minister today, but 9/11 is not definitely not among them.
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?