The Guardian shoots itself in the foot with latest Corbyn bashing

Support us and go ad-free

Polly Toynbee’s latest Guardian piece entitled ‘Labour people are optimists, but this time I see no hope’ contains a gaping hole. Here, she repeats the well rehearsed argument that Jeremy Corbyn is ‘unelectable’, patronising Corbyn supporters as “believing in Father Christmas” for thinking he can win the election.

Ironically, this gaping hole is articulated within the piece itself.

After the Corbyn bashing, Toynbee turns her cross-hairs to those who oppose him, criticising a “social democratic breakaway”.

Trident renewal is no rallying cry. Anti-anti-austerity is not a good look. Public sector “reform” is a dead duck, with the sector hewn down.

Toynbee is correct here, and shoots herself in the foot.

These are very good reasons why there will not be a split in the Labour party. The blairites have neither the ideas, nor the backbone. However, the comments also describe the Labour party under the administration of the other leadership hopefuls. Despite not all being the same gender, Yvette Cooper, Andy Burnham and Liz Kendall were hard to tell apart. These candidates represent the side of Labour Toynbee appears to be defending.

If Toynbee has lost hope under Corbyn, what hope is there under the leadership of those with “no rallying cry”?

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

The leadership of an invertebrate with watered down Tory spending plans did not go well in the 2015 election. Whereas a coherent anti-austerity message from the SNP annihilated Labour in Scotland. Being a real opposition is the path to victory, not being so indistinguishable from the Tories that people accidentally vote Labour in 2020.

After Hilary Benn’s pro-bombing theatrics earlier this month, the Telegraph (which was recently fined £30,000 for emails urging readers to vote Tory) raved that Hilary Benn looked like “the leader of the opposition”. This should not come as a surprise – it is handy for the Tories if the leader of the opposition does not actually oppose anything.

Toynbee chastises Corbyn for distracting the party “from the serious job of opposition”. Apparently it’s Corbyn, not people within the parliamentary Labour party opposing his leadership (instead of opposing the Tories), who is the problem.

Only 24% of the electorate voted Conservative in 2015. While Toynbee sensationalises this as a “massacre” (whose side is she on again?), it was a very slim majority. Why would we concentrate on the quarter of the country that voted Conservative, and not focus on the other 76%?

In the 94 English seats Labour must win, four out of five new votes need to come from Tory voters.

Not sure how Toynbee calculated this one; we only had 66% voter turn out. Pandering to Tory voters is not only difficult, but also how Labour will lose their core support and grassroots momentum. Tapping into the disillusioned is where victory lies, not capitulating to the Tory narrative.

In just 100 days of leadership Corbyn won a landslide by-election, initiated a membership surge of over 60,000, brought participatory democracy into Westminster with crowdsourced PMQs and enjoyed a significant victory on tax credits cuts.

https://twitter.com/UNITE_Jack/status/679265927872016384

While it is doom and gloom from commentators like Toynbee, Guardian readers have overwhelmingly recognised the first 100 days of Corbyn’s leadership as a success, and criticised the Guardian for its negative coverage. The view professed by the media elites stands in contrast to the readers.

Yet, even with this positive start, forecasting victory in 2020 would be a bit of a stretch. It would, however, be a useful one, energising people to look forward positively. What is both a stretch and not useful is predicting defeat after just the first 100 days, as Toynbee has done.

The Guardian’s brand of Corbyn bashing is less blatant than the Sun’s or the Telegraph’s, but it is perhaps more damaging. Toynbee must have gazed into her crystal ball to be so sure of defeat, so soon. The demoralising is all the more insidious for being packaged with sympathy.

Toynbee gushed over Tony Blair, yet attacks Corbyn at every possibility, even parroting claims he’s a terrorist sympathiser. This latest attack furthers my suspicion she is an establishment shill.

Featured image via cooperniall and David Holt.

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed