Corbyn silences media hysteria by announcing new unified shadow cabinet

Support us and go ad-free

If you glanced at the papers over the festive period, you’d be forgiven for thinking we were eagerly awaiting the arrival of the shadow cabinet announcement rather than Santa Claus. Newspapers were awash with speculation on the so-called ‘revenge’ reshuffle, debating whether Jeremy Corbyn would axe the cabinet ‘rebels’. Now the wait is over, and it falls far short of the vengeful reordering the media predicted.

The shadow cabinet was assembled in September, following Corbyn’s landslide victory in the Labour leadership contest. At its inception, the cabinet was described by Corbyn as “a strong combination of change and continuity”. However, as an MP not fully expecting to emerge the victor, with little ministerial experience himself, this was inevitably going to need some fine tuning. The last three months have put the cohesiveness of this assembly to the test, illuminating who shares Corbyn’s convictions, and is willing to support him.

This idea, of loyalty, has proven an inflammatory issue in relation to Corbyn. Many media commentators insist that it is hypocritical for him to remove MPs from the cabinet for contradicting his positions, after he rebelled numerous times against former Labour policy. Their rationale, however, defies itself.

Those making this case fail to acknowledge that it is likely Corbyn’s tendency to go against the party line contributed to him remaining a backbencher for over 30 years – rather than rising to the cabinet ranks. Did Corbyn bemoan his omission from the inner sanctum due to his unwavering beliefs? No, he accepted it as a consequence of his actions, and Labour MPs should do the same.

The first cabinet member to be dismissed was Michael Dugher who, speaking to Sky News, reasoned the move thus:

I think I tried to do my best in delivering some straight talking and honest politics, and I think it was a little too much for him, which is a shame.

This ‘straight talking’ was exercised in describing Momentum, a grassroots organisation inspired by Corbyn’s election campaign, in the following way:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

It occurred to me that their aggression is matched only by their stupidity. I don’t know what the point of them is.

He also warned Corbyn, via a BBC 5 Live’s Pienaar’s Politics programme interview, that “Labour is a broad church, not a religious cult” and, in another interview, accused him of allowing “totally destructive”and “self-indulgent” infighting. This seems a bit rich from the MP who seemingly coined the ‘revenge reshuffle’ phrase, and has been condemned by the public for having “done nothing but attack” Corbyn’s leadership.

Dugher has also been forthright with his opinion on terrorism, and particularly the landscape that gives rise to it. Responding to comments by Ken Livingstone about western interventions playing a part in inciting terrorism, Dugher said,

Stop the justifications, stop the moral equivalence bullshit

This is a relatively common sentiment in the political arena. David Cameron himself has warned against “grievance justification” being used in our discourse on terrorism. Seemingly, some in politics, and the wider community, refuse to confront the role the West has played in the rapid increase of extremist groups – despite ample evidence to the contrary. Thankfully, Corbyn has no place for such wilful ignorance in his cabinet.

Reportedly, Pat McFadden was another minister removed from the cabinet for similiar reasons. In the aftermath of the Paris attacks, McFadden spoke during Prime Ministers Questions:

Can I ask the Prime Minister to reject the view that sees terrorist acts as always being a response or a reaction to what we in the West do?

Although some MPs have responded to his dismissal as “stupid” and indicative of “intolerance”, the idiocy of McFadden’s dogmatic attitude towards terrorism is a dangerous obstacle to addressing it. Hopefully, his successor, Pat Glass, will be more scrupulous in her assessments.

Overall, defence seemed high on the agenda in the reshuffle. Maria Eagle has been replaced by Emily Thornberry as Shadow Secretary of State for Defence. Eagle is an advocate for the renewal of Trident, a position that stands in opposition to Corbyn’s anti-Trident stance, and Scottish Labour party policy. A decision on the renewal of Trident is expected this year, so moving Emily Thornberry to the position, who is also opposed to Trident renewal, will provide a more unified Labour position when the issue is debated in parliament.

That Corbyn dares co-ordinate a unified cabinet is also a bone of contention in media discourse. Commentators align his attempts for cohesiveness in the cabinet as a dictatorial move by a leader who claims to be democratic. However, they neglect to use the same argument against Cameron, who would also claim a democratic bent, and has filled his cabinet with like-minded neo-liberal hawks. This double standard when holding officials to account betrays the true impetus for the criticism, Corbyn-bashing for its own sake.

In this latest reshuffle, the media were not granted the anti-Corbyn fodder they crave. The changes are few, and measured. They do, though, send a strong message: defence is a priority, and the party needs to unite around a pro-peace agenda. In a country weary from 15 years of continuous warfare, tainted by its sickening collusions with extreme regimes, and embroiled in a tragic refugee crisis, this could not be more welcome.

Image via Wikipedia Creative Commons and Youtube.

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed