The government will silence some of its most articulate critics with this draconian new policy

The government's new gagging clause is silencing charities
Support us and go ad-free

The government is about to gag any person or organisation that receives government grants, banning them from using that money to campaign, lobby or influence parliament, government and political parties. The government says the measure will stop “the farce of government lobbying government”. In fact, the gagging clause will silence some of the government’s most articulate critics – exactly when we need them most.

From May of this year, a new clause, which has not gone before parliament, will be inserted into every government grant agreement:

The following costs are not Eligible Expenditure: Payments that support activity intended to influence or attempt to influence Parliament, government or political parties, or attempting to influence the awarding or renewal of contracts and grants, or attempting to influence legislative or regulatory action.

The implications of this little clause are enormous.

It silences criticism

The gagging clause will restrict charities’ ability to speak out against the government. In fact, Sir Stuart Etherington, chief executive of the National Council for Voluntary Organisations (NCVO) says it is:

tantamount to making charities take a vow of silence.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

While organisations can use their own privately raised funds to criticise the government as they see fit, they will no longer be able to use public money to do so. As such, charities will need to think twice before standing up for their beneficiaries, often society’s most vulnerable people, when they see government policy or cuts damaging their interests.

This silencing of criticism, which many think is the aim of the clause, will also have wider fallout.

It restricts scrutiny

The government routinely gives grants to voluntary sector organisations to work with – and deliver services to – society’s most vulnerable people, from homeless people to children in care. The organisations working on the front lines have unique insights into the effects of government policy on those people, and they will often pass their expertise back to government, evaluating their policies or suggesting improvements – i.e. “influencing” government.

The heads of charities believe the gagging clause will undermine their ability to keep doing that. 130 of them have signed a letter to David Cameron, which says:

The new clause will undermine the ability of these charities to feed in valuable insights that may help government – those working on programmes receiving any grant funding would be prohibited from speaking to MPs about developments in their local area, suggesting improvements to policy or legislation, responding to your government’s own consultations, meeting ministers to discuss broader issues and evidence from their programme or even from giving evidence if called by a select committee.

It shuts down campaigning

The Minister for the Cabinet Office, Matthew Hancock, says: “Taxpayers’ money must be spent on improving people’s lives and spreading opportunities, not wasted on the farce of government lobbying government.”

Critics argue that seeking to influence government, or campaigning, is often the most efficient way to improve people’s lives and spread opportunities; it has done so for centuries. Here’s Sir Stuart Etherington again:

Campaigning is where many charities can make a bigger impact with limited resources than they would through service delivery alone. Often this will save taxpayers’ money in the long term, as issues are addressed at their roots. After all, is it better to care for victims of crime in the aftermath of an event, or help to prevent crimes in the first place?

Campaigning, which can make for uncomfortable listening for a government intent on cutting funds and services, will be seriously undermined by the gagging clause.

It favours corporate lobbyists

The clause will not apply to government contracts, only to grants. Private contractors like G4S and Serco, along with voluntary organisations working with government through contracts rather than grants, will be allowed to keep lobbying government as they like, including for the renewal of their own contracts. This makes a mockery of the stated aim of the clause: to stop public money from being used to lobby government.

And, as Conservative MP Sarah Wollaston has pointed out, it also silences an important counterbalance to corporate lobbyists:

It seeks to solve a problem that doesn’t exist

Nobody would deny that charities need to be held to account, particularly after the Kids Company and Age UK. scandals. But charities are already restricted in the lobbying they can carry out and subject to significant scrutiny.

As Patrick Butler writes in The Guardian:

The sock puppet clause is more about political intimidation than addressing abuses (charities are after all, already covered by law restricting them from political activity; most grants are already tightly restricted). The giveaway is in the guidance, which allows individual ministers to exempt grantees from the clause.

It is the government, more than charities, that needs to be scrutinised and held to account – yet the government it is gagging those who have the resources and expertise to do that. When seen in the context of its crackdowns on opposition funding, on trade unions, on the House of Lords and on parliamentary process, the picture becomes clear: the government is determined to silence dissent, wherever it finds it.

Get involved!

Make your views known to your MP before the guidance comes into force on 1 May.
Support The Canary so we can keep reporting on issues like this one.

Featured image via Craig Sunter/Flickr

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed