After Buzzfeed reported that Twitter’s defining feature – its live, second-by-second timeline – was to be changed as soon as the following week by an algorithmic one based on ‘relevance’, users went berserk. For a time last weekend #RIPTwitter was the highest trending hashtag on the site, prompting recently-appointed CEO Jack Dorsey to attempt some Westminster-worthy damage control – that largely #failed.
Twitter is live. Twitter is real-time. Twitter is about who & what you follow. And Twitter is here to stay! By becoming more Twitter-y.
— jack (@jack) February 6, 2016
The company has since been shown up by the vague attempt at a denial, not only because Dorsey skirted the subject with the phrase ‘next week’ (rather than ‘ever’), but also because the change has in fact been put into effect despite public protest, and only five days after it was first reported.
There is an option for users to turn the feature off if they wish, and refreshing the timeline will return it to the previous, live and up-to-date format that originally attracted so many users. Whether or not this capability has been added after the outcry has not been discussed.
Still, many are vocalising their fears that, just like changes to Facebook over the years, a feature that is initially optional will soon become permanent with neither the consultation or enthusiasm of users. The debate over whether or not this affects the arguably democratic nature of the live timeline, by enforcing both corporate influence and control over users’ personal data and content, rages on, as users remain uncertain about the future of their personal news feed.
This is the latest in a recent series of criticisms of Twitter management for trying to fix what, in the public’s eyes, ain’t broke. Despite reporting earnings that exceeded expectations just as he was appointed Chief Executive mid-last year, Dorsey has been insistent that the site must enact new initiatives to boost stalling growth of its members and audience. This included the equally unpopular suggestion of a more than 70-fold increase of the 140 character limit to 10,000. The news of this potential move resulted in a drop in share price of 3%, to its lowest ever value.
Have you considered gross privacy violations in order to go Full Zuckerberg?
— Paul Hagan (@thepaulhagan) February 6, 2016
Meanwhile, widely-requested functions are being ignored by the company. Users have long been asking for an edit button; ironically, a function of Facebook that they do want incorporated into their timelines. In addition to lamenting the undesired changes, the global audience has been trolling Twitter on its own platform about its misguided mimicry.
us: can we get an edit button
twitter: here they likes instead of faves
us: ok how about the-
twitter: ima be facebook now#RIPTwitter
— B e i r 🌹❤️🕊 (@isthatbratpit) February 6, 2016
The most satisfying – and troubling – irony of this story is that, in the attempt to spin the event by using dodgy corporate doublespeak, the company has performed an own goal by encouraging and enabling the loud-hailing of its users’ critical, democratic voice. Unfortunately what this development proves is that the public tweeting about its desire to retain that level of control over their own content holds, apparently, little bearing on the company’s decisions for its future.
Featured image by keiyac/Flickr
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?