The current government in Turkey has absolutely lost the plot. A Turkish ground invasion of Syria is looking more likely by the minute, and the world for some reason continues to ignore its human rights abuses at home. But could there really be an international war if Ankara sends troops into Syria? And could this see the UK getting entrenched in yet another avoidable conflict thanks to the warmongering impulse of a misguided ally?
Once praised for being a beacon of democracy in the Middle East (which was never really true anyway), Turkey is now essentially a rogue state. It has killed hundreds of its own citizens, imprisoned many more, and it attacks those fighting against Daesh and other jihadis in Syria and Iraq. Without a doubt, it is part of the problem – not part of the solution.
But it seems that David Cameron and Barack Obama are hoping the insanity of the Turkish regime will just go away quietly.
It will continue to get worse, and it could well see a significant increase in tensions between the west and Russia.
Six reasons why peace depends on Turkey being stopped
Here are just six big reasons why dealing with Turkey is key to resolving the conflict in Syria, ending the ensuing refugee crisis, and preventing a dangerous escalation of hostilities in the region.
- Freedom of speech is all but dead in Turkey today. Calling for democracy or peace is seen as a terrorist offence, and no one is safe from government repression. This is why one professor has called the current regime a fascist movement.
- There have been numerous terrorist attacks in Turkey in the last year. The latest came on 17 February. But the government has ‘mysteriously’ not gone after the culprits – who have usually been inspired by Daesh and other jihadi movements in Syria. Instead, it has waged war since July 2015 against the PKK (a secular Kurdish movement), which has consistently sought peace in recent years. The PKK and its allies have also been among the most effective opponents of Daesh on the ground in both Iraq and Syria. The group’s main ‘crime’ has been to call for regional autonomy for Turkey’s Kurdish communities. (Just imagine if London had waged war on Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland for wanting the same thing.)
- Turkey’s political priorities have included increasing military coordination with Saudi Arabia (which is currently massacring civilians in Yemen), blockading the democratic and secular region of Rojava in northern Syria, and giving support to jihadis in Syria. Its megalomaniac leader – President Erdoğan – apparently hopes to extend his regime’s influence in the Middle East and submit the region to his own toxic brand of pseudo-religious chauvinism.
- Ankara has been escalating tensions with Russia ever since it shot down a Russian jet in November 2015. Russia has held back until now, but if Turkish forces invade Syria there are likely to be direct military confrontations between Moscow and Turkey (which has the second largest army in NATO).
- The western press is usually reluctant to criticise its governments’ repressive allies abroad, but Turkey has increasingly drawn severe criticism in such media outlets. This says a lot about just how far the Turkish regime has fallen.
- And last but by no means least, Turkey has already begun to attack Syria itself. This involves bombing not just Assad’s forces but also the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF). The SDF is an alliance led by Rojava’s YPG/J militias, and has been making massive gains against Daesh and other jihadis in Syria in recent months (with air support from both the USA and Russia). If the world doesn’t respond to Turkey’s counter-actions, Ankara will feel much more confident about launching a full-scale ground invasion. This would be aimed at destroying the democratic experience of Rojava while propping up the jihadi forces Turkey has been backing since the very start of the Syrian Civil War.
The west has been silent until now. Let’s break that silence!
Mike Whitney at Counterpunch asserted in December 2015 that governments in the USA and Europe need to stop supporting “the two biggest terrorist incubators on the planet”. By this he meant Turkey and Saudi Arabia, continued support for whom would lead to “a serious dust-up with Russia”. Until now, he says, Europe in particular has been silent about Turkish human rights abuses because its leaders want Ankara’s help to control the flux of refugees into the continent:
The increase in military cooperation within NATO… and the piling up of NATO forces near Turkey’s border… took place in parallel with the deal between Ankara and Brussels.
So far, the west has stood by Turkey in spite of its deteriorating political situation and war crimes. And a massive military operation against Rojava would be, as the Guardian has said, a sign of desperation that would lead to “a potentially catastrophic spreading of the Syrian conflict”. At the same time, the Independent’s Patrick Cockburn has insisted that:
Turkey is the last regional power that could reverse the trend of events in Syria by open military intervention
But Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev has said that “all sides must be compelled to sit at the negotiating table, instead of unleashing yet another war on Earth”. In other words, if a Saudi-backed Turkish intervention in Syria did take place, this could unleash an international conflict that would be much worse than what Russia Insider has referred to as Turkey’s Vietnam.
Russia seems to prefer diplomacy, calling for a resolution at the UN demanding Turkey “cease any actions that undermine Syria’s sovereignty and territorial integrity”. The Turkish regime, on the other hand, seems only to speak the language of violence. And it’s still backed internationally, with France and the USA both rejecting Russia’s resolution outright. Even so, NATO member Luxembourg has suggested the military alliance may not support Turkey if it provokes war with Russia.
Everything now depends on what the big international powers do about Turkey, and how committed they are to reaching a peace agreement to end the Syrian civil war. Together, the USA and Russia are capable of resolving the conflict without further escalation, but only if they can cooperate long enough to do so.
To avoid the possibility of an international conflict, we must pressure our leaders on these two issues:
Firstly, there must be genuine efforts to resolve the Syrian crisis peacefully.
Secondly, there must be firm action taken in order to end Turkey’s war against Kurdish communities at home and abroad, while ensuring a Turkish ground invasion of Syria does not occur.
Peace in the Middle East and the wider world could well depend on us pushing for these measures.
Get involved with the national demonstration – “Stop Turkey’s War on Kurds: Break the Silence” – planned for 6 March in London.
Ask the British government to change its hostile stance towards the PKK by signing this petition.
And sign this petition aimed at Barack Obama in order to put pressure on Turkey to change tack.
Featured image via Christiaan Triebert
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?