The government’s mass spying organisation – the Government Communication Headquarters (GCHQ) – has joined Twitter, in an attempt to woo the public:
Hello, world. https://t.co/SROtSsE8KB
— GCHQ (@GCHQ) May 16, 2016
After Edward Snowden exposed GCHQ’s mass, indiscriminate surveillance programme the organisation wants to clean up its public image.
Andrew Pike, Director of Communications at GCHQ, said:
In joining social media GCHQ can use its own voice to talk directly about the important work we do in keeping Britain safe.
GCHQ’s social media presence will be used to further the government’s narrative. The government uses the threat of terrorism to erode the rights of its citizens. Apparently it needs to hoard all of our personal information to ‘keep Britain safe’.
However, moments after the agency joined, it became apparent Twitter wasn’t buying it:
hi! Presumably to DM you we just need to say it out loud in our kitchen while our phone's nearby, right? 🙂
— C J Thorpe-Tracey (@christt) May 16, 2016
The documents leaked by Snowden show that GCHQ has the ability to turn on our microphones and cameras on our computers, listen to our phone calls and track our locations, while collecting all sorts of data about what we do online.
Hi @GCHQ you don't know where I left my keys do you?
— Mhairi Hunter (@MhairiHunter) May 16, 2016
GCHQ indiscriminately collects data from every visible user on the internet.
@DrLucyRogers surely following count should be "everybody"
— Benjamin Gray (@benbobgray) May 16, 2016
Aside from GCHQ, the government is currently using its ‘domestic extremism’ police unit to spy on the Green Party, environmental activists and children. So it would be naive to think that the government does not have its own motives for collecting our data.
Twitter users continued to make light of the situation:
Now I can follow you.#tablesturned
— Graham Terris (@grahamterris) May 16, 2016
Ive just followed @GCHQ on the basis that they've been 'following' me for years.
— Mr Lee Jasper (@LeeJasper) May 16, 2016
While this Twitter used the occasion to spread valuable life lessons:
Others took a more serious route:
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) May 16, 2016
Apparently the following revelation isn’t satire:
Many Twitter users picked up on a certain handle GCHQ followed:
— Jim Waterson (@jimwaterson) May 16, 2016
Does the threat of terrorism justify mass surveillance?
GCHQ’s new Twitter bio reads:
Where our brightest people bring together intelligence and technology to keep Britain safe.
Theresa May’s Investigatory Powers Bill or ‘snoopers charter’ seeks to make mass surveillance official government policy. Ostensibly, this is to prevent terrorism, but there is no evidence it works. In fact, treating the entire country as suspects is likely to be detrimental for terrorism prevention. It’s the equivalent of building a breathtakingly unnecessary and humongous haystack to find a handful of needles in.
The following is a chart produced by The Canary, showing the real risk of dying from a terrorist attack in the UK. It was inspired by this chart The Intercept produced for the US.
The death caused by Muslim extremism within the chart was the murder of Lee Rigby in May 2013. However, Seumas Milne – now Jeremy Corbyn’s strategist – said that this “was not terrorism in the normal sense”, because the killers specifically targeted a soldier who served in Afghanistan. It is important to realise the link; this was not an indiscriminate attack.
As we can see from the chart, one is way more likely to meet their end being struck by lightning than in a terrorist attack here in Britain. There are 2 deaths from lightning every year, 5 deaths from car accidents every day, and 110 deaths from air pollution every day. This is compared to 1 death from Muslim extremism since 2010, which is mirrored by 1 Muslim death at the hands of white supremacists since 2010.
As Glenn Greenwald notes:
The greatest obstacle to anti-Muslim fear mongering and bigotry: reality.
Islamist boogeymen are useful because they allow the government to scare people into handing over their rights. The risk of British people being attacked by terrorists is blown out of proportion to expand state power.
Hats off to Twitter for employing an important defence against such authoritarian policy – ridicule.
-Support Liberty UK.
-Support Big Brother Watch.
–Stand up for digital rights.
-Support The Canary.
Featured image via Defence Images/Flickr
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?