The government’s spying agency tries to woo social media, then falls flat on its face (TWEETS)

Avatar

The government’s mass spying organisation – the Government Communication Headquarters (GCHQ) – has joined Twitter, in an attempt to woo the public:

After Edward Snowden exposed GCHQ’s mass, indiscriminate surveillance programme the organisation wants to clean up its public image.

Andrew Pike, Director of Communications at GCHQ, said:

In joining social media GCHQ can use its own voice to talk directly about the important work we do in keeping Britain safe.

GCHQ’s social media presence will be used to further the government’s narrative. The government uses the threat of terrorism to erode the rights of its citizens. Apparently it needs to hoard all of our personal information to ‘keep Britain safe’.

However, moments after the agency joined, it became apparent Twitter wasn’t buying it:

The documents leaked by Snowden show that GCHQ has the ability to turn on our microphones and cameras on our computers, listen to our phone calls and track our locations, while collecting all sorts of data about what we do online.

 

 

GCHQ indiscriminately collects data from every visible user on the internet.

Aside from GCHQ, the government is currently using its ‘domestic extremism’ police unit to spy on the Green Party, environmental activists and children. So it would be naive to think that the government does not have its own motives for collecting our data.

Twitter users continued to make light of the situation:

While this Twitter used the occasion to spread valuable life lessons:

https://twitter.com/stavvers/status/732173214802161664

Others took a more serious route:

Apparently the following revelation isn’t satire:

https://twitter.com/jamesrbuk/status/732159730072850432

Many Twitter users picked up on a certain handle GCHQ followed:

Does the threat of terrorism justify mass surveillance?

GCHQ’s new Twitter bio reads:

Where our brightest people bring together intelligence and technology to keep Britain safe.

Theresa May’s Investigatory Powers Bill or ‘snoopers charter’ seeks to make mass surveillance official government policy. Ostensibly, this is to prevent terrorism, but there is no evidence it works. In fact, treating the entire country as suspects is likely to be detrimental for terrorism prevention. It’s the equivalent of building a breathtakingly unnecessary and humongous haystack to find a handful of needles in.

The following is a chart produced by The Canary, showing the real risk of dying from a terrorist attack in the UK. It was inspired by this chart The Intercept produced for the US.

UK-terror-chart

The death caused by Muslim extremism within the chart was the murder of Lee Rigby in May 2013. However, Seumas Milne – now Jeremy Corbyn’s strategist – said that this “was not terrorism in the normal sense”, because the killers specifically targeted a soldier who served in Afghanistan. It is important to realise the link; this was not an indiscriminate attack.

As we can see from the chart, one is way more likely to meet their end being struck by lightning than in a terrorist attack here in Britain. There are 2 deaths from lightning every year, 5 deaths from car accidents every day, and 110 deaths from air pollution every day. This is compared to 1 death from Muslim extremism since 2010, which is mirrored by 1 Muslim death at the hands of white supremacists since 2010.

As Glenn Greenwald notes:

The greatest obstacle to anti-Muslim fear mongering and bigotry: reality.

Islamist boogeymen are useful because they allow the government to scare people into handing over their rights. The risk of British people being attacked by terrorists is blown out of proportion to expand state power.

Hats off to Twitter for employing an important defence against such authoritarian policy – ridicule.

Get involved!

-Support Liberty UK.

-Support Big Brother Watch.

Stand up for digital rights.

-Support The Canary.

Featured image via Defence Images/Flickr

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed