Nicola Sturgeon may have just put in motion a second referendum on Scottish independence, following the UK’s vote to leave the EU.
In a speech in Edinburgh, Sturgeon said that:
Scotland, like London and Northern Ireland, voted overwhelmingly to stay in the European Union. […] It is significant, in my view, that we did so after a campaign that was positive about the EU. Unfortunately of course, yesterday’s result in Scotland was not echoed across the United Kingdom.
She went on to say that:
The UK wide vote to leave the EU is one I deeply regret. The vote across England and Wales […] was a sign of divergence between Scotland and large parts of the UK, and how we see our place in the world.
Sturgeon went on to criticise both Labour and the Tories, for fundamentally not listening to the public, and said that the “Westminster Establishment had some serious soul searching to do”.
Scotland faces the prospect of being taken out the EU against its will. I regard that as democratically unacceptable.
She cited that the first Scottish independence referendum was portrayed as leading to a possible forced exit from the EU for Scotland (which has now happened regardless), and also that the “supposed guarantee” of continued EU membership was crucial in people’s decision to vote Yes in the independence referendum.
It is my job now to act responsibly and in the interests of all of Scotland, and that is what I intend to do.
The Scottish Cabinet are meeting tomorrow to discuss current matters, including financial stability.
But, the crucial statement from Sturgeon was this:
The manifesto that the SNP was elected on last month said this: ‘The Scottish parliament should have the right to hold a second referendum if there was significant and material change […] such as Scotland being taken out of the EU against it’s will.‘ Scotland now does face that prospect […] It’s a statement of the obvious the option of a second referendum should be on the table. And it is on the table.
She also said she had spoken to Sadiq Khan, Mayor of London – and the thrust was that he was also unhappy with the result. Could the London Mayor be seriously considering the position of the capital, based on the referendum result? Time will tell although it is highly unlikely.
You can watch the full speech here:
So, could a second independence referendum actually happen? And if so, how soon?
Alex Salmond signalled less than a fortnight ago that if the rest of the UK voted to leave the EU, a second “Indy Ref” would be possible in three years:
The rational thing to do under these circumstances is to have the referendum in that period because in effect Scotland would not leave, Scotland would remain and the rest of the UK would leave. Under the context that [a referendum] would be quite legitimate because Scotland would have voted to remain and the UK would have voted to leave. [it would be before 2020] because Scotland would remain and the UK would leave – it would be a perfect democratic mandate for both of these things.
With 62% of Scotland voting to Remain in the EU, the SNP now have a seemingly open, albeit half-ajar, door to walk through and call a second referendum.
The challenge will be whether the people of Scotland who voted to remain in the EU, feel as strongly about that as they do Scottish independence. The latest polling on Scottish independence still put a “No” vote ahead, but only marginally. Alex Salmond said this morning about the invoking of Article 50:
That sets the clock ticking. So some time over the next two to two-and-a-half years, there would have to be a Scottish referendum to see if the people of Scotland want to assert their national independence, as part of a wider Europe.
There was already a deep-seated dislike of the Westminster establishment within Scotland, even before this referendum. The very fact that Scotland is now, essentially, being forced by the rest of the UK to do something it categorically doesn’t want to, may be enough to tip the balance of an independence referendum in the SNP’s favour.
The Brexit result, that came as a shock to so many, could well signal the beginning of the end of the United Kingdom as we know it.
Featured image via Screengrab.
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?