The Conservative government sneaks out plans to put children’s lives at risk for money [TWEETS]

The government came under heavy criticism on Wednesday, after it quietly announced plans which may put schoolchildren’s lives at risk. The Conservatives are scrapping the requirement to have fire fighting water sprinkler systems installed in all new schools, claiming it is in line with building regulations. But Labour and fire fighting associations have hit back at the move. And the likelihood is that a cost saving exercise is underway.

In an update to a Design for Fire Safety in Schools document, the Department for Education (DfE) stated that:

The Building Regulations do not require the installation of fire sprinkler suppression systems in school buildings for life safety and therefore [guidelines] no longer include an expectation that most new school buildings will be fitted with them.

However, sprinklers are particularly good at limiting fire size, spread and damage and are therefore a very effective property protection measure. In some situations property protection may be an important design consideration for business continuity, particularly in large secondary schools and some special schools. Property protection standard sprinkler systems will be used in these situations.

The policy of recommended sprinkler systems was introduced by Labour Schools Minister Jim Knight in 2007. Research conducted by the Chief Fire Officers Association shows that between 2003/04 and 2013/14 there were 5,132 fires in educational buildings, resulting in 148 casualties. And in 2012/13 alone there were 635 fires; more than one a day.

Figures from the National Fire Sprinkler Network revealed that in at least 16 instances last year automatic fire sprinkler systems significantly reduced damage and disruption from school fires. The Chairman of the Fire Sector Federation, Brian Robinson, said the government:

appears to have relegated the principles of property protection to an afterthought … Many of our members see no reason to change the current policy of a risk-based approach for the requirement to install sprinklers in schools and urge the Department to reconsider.

Read on...

There have been several cases of fires in schools just in the past month alone. Selsey Academy in West Sussex was set ablaze on the 21 August, with 10 fire engines in attendance and dozen of homes evacuated. On 24 August 12 fire crews were sent to the Cecil Jones Academy in Southend, Essex, where firefighters had to use water from a nearby swimming pool to help bring a blaze under control.

Julian Parsons of the Chief Fire Officers Association said:

This is a retrograde step that doesn’t make any sense. Sprinklers don’t just save lives, they prevent fires from spreading and causing significant damage and disruption to our children’s education.

This news comes in the wake of the chaos in April surrounding Private Finance Initiative-funded schools in Scotland being closed over safety fears. In all, 17 schools were shut and First Minister Nicola Sturgeon ordered 32 councils to carry out safety assessments on every school under their control.

Labour’s Shadow Education Secretary, Angela Rayner, tweeted her obvious disapproval:

Fortunately, casualties from fires in schools in the UK are extremely rare. But this surely must be, in part, due to the robust systems that are in place to protect children. And these include the installation of sprinkler systems. Aside from the obvious protection of children, research shows that the systems actually save money in the long run. It would seem that, once again, the Tories are putting a price on the UK’s education system. But this time, it’s one which could end in tragic consequences.

Get Involved

Write to your MP to object to the Tories plans.

Support The Canary so we can keep bringing you the news that matters.

Featured image via Wikimedia Commons

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed