A prominent independent media outlet has been suspended from Twitter for criticising The Daily Express. Pro-independence Scottish outlet Wings Over Scotland was barred after a journalist from The Express bombarded Twitter’s legal representatives with complaints. But it came as the paper ran one of its most race-baiting headlines to date.
A “free press”?
Express journalist Siobhan McFadyen complained that she had been subject to abuse, after self-styled “Reverend” Stuart Campbell labelled her a “disgrace”. McFadyen tweeted that “It was trauma for me cause I got death threats”, referencing the alleged abuse. The tweet in question from Campbell’s Wings Twitter account was this:
— Siobhan McFadyen (@siobhanyc) September 11, 2016
Campbell’s comments were in relation to an article McFadyen wrote in The Express on 10 September. She implied that independence supporters had been responsible for violence before and after 2014’s independence referendum. In it, she stated that:
At the height of the campaign there was violent outbreaks, death threats and ugly scenes all over Scotland as campaigns gathered on both sides of the debate. High profile figures and journalists were issued with death threats as an unprecedented police operation swung into action. Police Scotland was forced to set up a special task force to deal with widespread outbreaks of violence, threats and public disorder for months before and after the referendum.
McFadyen also claimed that First Minister Nicola Sturgeon was:
ready to unleash yet more violence on the streets at a cost to the taxpayer.
But Campbell refutes these claims. In a column on the Wings website, he claims that:
We’re having trouble recalling a single actual documented death threat. There were claims that there had been some, but to the best of our recollection nobody ever produced evidence of any. But “widespread outbreaks of violence”? If only we had some sort of official police statement about this. Just one day before the [referendum] vote, the chairman of the Scottish Police Federation publicly and unequivocally rubbished the idea that the campaign had been a violent one.
Just what is considered abuse?
It came as The Express published on 12 September what can only be considered a ‘race-baiting‘ front-page headline. It was in relation to a report by a senior government adviser on integration, Dame Louise Casey. The preview of the report, as mentioned in The Telegraph, was more in relation to the impact of migration on community cohesion and the upholding of law. But The Express instead chose to summarise it like this:
The Express is not renowned for its subtle headlines. But it has a long history of truly shocking and fear-mongering front pages, as this Twitter user pointed out:
I think that it's an utter disgrace that the Daily Express regularly stokes up hatred toward migrants. pic.twitter.com/LNp6H2q3Sp
— Ross Colquhoun (@rosscolquhoun) September 12, 2016
So it would appear that, according to Twitter rules, any prominent user can now be suspended for the actions of their followers. And while the question of whether McFadyen is a “disgrace” or not remains to be seen, it’s surely worrying that Wings Over Scotland should be barred for simply voicing that opinion.
The decision maybe speaks more about the influence that papers like The Express have over social media companies. But it also speaks volumes that an independent media outlet can be sanctioned by Twitter so quickly while one of the most right-wing, hate-filled newspapers in the UK can print race-baiting filth day in, day out – and still get away with it.
– Complain to the Independent Press Standards Organisation about The Daily Express.
Featured image via Screengrab
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?