A five-year-old child has just sent Theresa May a blistering message. A video of the young girl, named Brook, was uploaded to YouTube by her mother. And it’s a rallying cry against the May government’s treatment of vulnerable people, and its eagerness for war.
Brook’s fury at the priorities shown by May’s government is clear, even before she launches into her fiery charge:
I’ve got something to say to you Theresa May [shakes head in absolute incredulity]. Yesterday night, I was out on the streets and I saw hundreds, millions, of homeless people. I saw one with floppy ears, I saw loads.
You should be out there Theresa May. You should be [bringing] biscuits, hot chocolate, sandwiches, building houses.
A real crisis
Although buoyed by a child’s enthusiasm, Brook is not wrong about how visible homelessness is in the UK today. Since 2010, the number of recorded rough sleepers in England has doubled.
In addition, as homeless charity Crisis has reported, the number of households in England that applied for statutory homelessness assistance increased by 11% in 2015/16 compared to 2010/11. To qualify for this homeless category, you must either “lack a secure place in which you are entitled to live or not reasonably be able to stay in your current accommodation”.
The total number of households in England that applied for this assistance in 2015/16 was 114,790.
And neither of these calculations include the ‘hidden homeless‘, those not registered with a local authority. Crisis’s research suggests that these people, who survive by crashing on couches and in squats, make up the majority of the actual homeless.
Austerity is exacerbating the problem
As Brook suggests, food and (most importantly) housing are required to resolve this crisis. But May’s government has shown a determination to continue with an austerity agenda that makes the problem worse. The policies the Tories have implemented – such as local council cuts, right-to-buy, and benefit sanctions (all in an alleged attempt to see the country ‘live within its means’) – have made homelessness much more likely for many citizens.
Brook then points out to May that it’s not money that’s the problem for the government:
Look, I’m only five years old. There’s nothing I can do about it. I’m saving up money and there’ll never be enough. You’ve got the pot of money, spend some and help people. That’s what you’ve got to do.
Cause we’ve had lots of wars in this country and I do not like that Theresa May. I’m very angry.
It is startling that this comparison comes from a five-year-old child, but it’s an apt one. Obviously, the government does have money. But, Brook alludes, it is choosing to spend it on “lots of wars” rather than on the country’s most vulnerable citizens.
Priorities, priorities, Theresa May
I have sat in this chamber too many times and heard we can’t afford to look after the disabled; we can’t afford to look after the unemployed; we can’t afford to pay pensions on time. But we the government are making the difficult choices.
And all those people who have been making that argument for austerity are now the very same people who are telling us that we can afford to write a blank cheque for these useless weapons.
According to the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, the cost of replacing the Trident missile could exceed £200bn. But this a small price for the government to pay for, as Black puts it, preserving “Westminster’s self-indulgent image of importance”.
That, evidently, is the government’s priority. But it’s one that many people in the country do not share. Especially this remarkable, and ferocious, little girl.
Take that, Theresa!
– Take action with The People’s Assembly Against Austerity.
– Find out how you can help Crisis with the UK’s homelessness.
– Support The Canary if you appreciate the work we do.
Image via Holly Matthews/YouTube
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?