The DWP got some unwanted Christmas presents, as more shocking stories were exposed

Support us and go ad-free

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) was repeatedly under the spotlight over the Christmas period. After a year of controversy and criticism, the DWP was once again drawing negative headlines. And some of the news was shocking.

Covering up failure?

Firstly, campaigners accused the government and the DWP of trying to cover up the deaths of seven benefit claimants who had undergone fit-for-work tests. The government had appointed Professor Malcolm Harrington to review the Work Capability Assessment (WCA) process. A WCA is a test used by the DWP to decide if sick and disabled people are entitled to benefits.

But a Freedom of Information (FOI) request by Disability News Service (DNS) to the DWP showed that it withheld reports on the deaths of seven people from the professor. Harrington told DNS that if he had seen them, he would have remembered “such damning indictments of the system”. The DWP told DNS:

The Department does not hold any information to confirm or deny whether these Peer Reviews were shared with Professor Harrington.

Rewarding cruelty?

Then, an investigation by The Mirror revealed that the DWP had paid private firms over half a billion pounds over four years to carry out WCAs. Analysis showed that Atos and Capita earned £507m between January 2013 and November 2016. The money was specifically to assess people for Personal Independence Payment (PIP) awards. But the companies appear not to have been doing their jobs properly. As figures show that 61% of 90,000 claimants who appealed against a PIP decision at a tribunal won their case.

Atos said that the final decision on whether to give someone benefits was down to the DWP. A Capita spokesman said:

Capita carries out PIP assessments according to DWP guidelines and professional codes of conduct.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

The DWP told The Mirror that “payments to our providers reflect the amount of work they do for us”.

Hiding information?

The DWP came under fire over PIP again on 30 December. A member of the public submitted an FOI request, asking it how many disabled people had lost money after moving from the former Disability Living Allowance (DLA) to PIP. But as The Daily Record reported, the DWP has refused to publish the information, saying it will be released at a later date. Emma Wilde, who submitted the FOI in October 2016, said:

It is disgraceful that this information isn’t being released. I believe the reason the Government don’t want to tell us the answers to these questions is because they know they will show how profoundly unfair the system is.

In response to the FOI, the DWP said:

The department intend to provide detailed breakdowns of DLA to PIP reassessment outcomes in due course.

But another story about the DWP that broke over the Christmas period raised serious questions about the department. And more specifically, about its relationship with the NHS.

Shocking allegations

A seriously ill 55-year-old father died after the DWP told his GP not to write him any more sick notes. The department declared James Harrison, from Netherley, fit for work after having a WCA. This was despite him living with a serious lung condition, depression and anxiety. Harrison had worked for 30 years before losing his job at a community centre. He fell ill last year, and died of heart failure in November 2016.

The case only came to light after his daughter Abbie demanded to see her father’s medical records. And she found a letter from the DWP. It said:

She told The Liverpool Echo:

I think it is a disgrace that managers at the job centre who know nothing about medicine should be interfering in any way in the relationship between a doctor and a patient.

When the job centre starts to get involved in telling doctors about the health of their patients, that is a really slippery slope to be on.

A spokeswoman for the DWP said:

The GP would have been notified so they know the outcome of the assessment and as the letter says, there’s no longer any requirement to provide a fit note unless the claimant appeals the decision, or their medical condition worsens or they have a new medical condition.

Gongs for the DWP

But while the DWP continued to feature heavily in negative headlines, the government didn’t seem to notice; judging by the Queen’s New Year’s Honours. Because, as one social media user pointed out, the government awarded civil servants from the department 11 gongs:

The DWP was the focus of numerous campaigns and protests during 2016. Many people see it as the face of divisive austerity and attacks on disabled people, the poor and the sick. But the culture of ‘benefit shaming’ did not go unnoticed last year; the UN twice slammed the government and the department over “grave”, “serious” and “systematic” violations of people’s human rights. Will 2017 see an improvement for people on benefits? With more Tory cuts still to come, the jury is well and truly out.

Get Involved

– Support Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC).

– Sign the petition to stop cuts to disabled people’s benefits.

– Write to your MP asking them to take action on poverty and inequality.

Featured image via Flickr

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed