A Mail hack attacks Oxfam, reminds us all why nobody trusts Blairites anymore [TWEETS]
An Oxfam report [pdf] has revealed that just eight men own the same wealth as the world’s poorest 50%. Yet you may have thought it reported something else, if you follow Mail on Sunday commentator Dan Hodges. Namely that Oxfam had done a hatchet job on Microsoft founder and philanthropist Bill Gates:
Oxfam are slagging off Bill Gates. Bill Gates has given over $28 billion to charity, including $8 billion to improve global health.
— (((Dan Hodges))) (@DPJHodges) January 16, 2017
The Oxfam report
In its press release, Oxfam points out the following:
The report describes how the inequality crisis is being fuelled by companies whose business models are increasingly focused on delivering ever-higher returns to wealthy owners and top executives. Companies are structured to dodge taxes, drive down workers’ wages and squeeze producers instead of fairly contributing to an economy that benefits everyone. The key theme of this year’s World Economic Forum is responsive and responsible leadership.
Read on...
Support us and go ad-freeOxfam is calling for a fundamental change in the way we manage our economies so that they work for everyone, not just a privileged few. The report is published amid increasing concerns about the economic status quo, with the Bank of England’s Chief Economist warning recently that a ‘rebirth of economics’ is needed to replace out-dated models.
The press release continues in a similar fashion, focusing on the system that allows this disparity as opposed to the people who benefit from it.
Attacking Bill Gates
The idea that Oxfam is “slagging off Bill Gates” doesn’t hold up if you read the actual report. Oxfam writes [pdf, p19]:
When Bill Gates left Microsoft in 2006 he had net wealth of $50bn. A decade later this had increased to $75bn, despite his commendable attempts to give it away through his Foundation. Global financial services company UBS has estimated that in the next 20 years, 500 people will hand over $2.1 trillion to their heirs, a sum larger than the GDP of India, a country of 1.3 billion people. If these returns continue, it is quite possible that we could see the world’s first trillionaire within 25 years.
A number of billionaires have agreed to join Bill Gates and give a proportion of their wealth away. While this is welcome, it does not substitute for adequate and fair taxation, a fact that Bill Gates himself has noted.
This final sentence suggests that Oxfam and Gates are actually in agreement on what the problem is.
Nothing to see here
Hodges seems to have overlooked these sections of the report. He’s also suggesting that Oxfam has called for an investigation into Gates:
Never mind investigating Bill Gates, we need a serious investigation of the charity sector. They're all losing the plot.
— (((Dan Hodges))) (@DPJHodges) January 16, 2017
Joining him in misinterpreting Oxfam was Rupert Myers, a political correspondent from The Telegraph:
https://twitter.com/RupertMyers/status/820908532082085888
Hodges continued:
Charity sector is intensely competitive. So there's now an arms race going on over who can say the most ludicrous, and "newsworthy" things.
— (((Dan Hodges))) (@DPJHodges) January 16, 2017
Median salary of charity CEOs is £55,000. Last year Oxfam CEO earned £125,248, with a pension contribution of £12,525.
— (((Dan Hodges))) (@DPJHodges) January 16, 2017
This last tweet would suggest that Hodges is against people involved in charities earning high wages. And yet his earlier tweets are in support of Bill Gates earning billions. Which makes it hard to fully understand what his point is. Either he thinks people involved in charity should be free to earn whatever they like without criticism or he thinks the exact opposite of that.
Distraction techniques
Hodges alleged that Oxfam had ‘slagged off’ Gates. And yet it quite clearly did not. He also suggested that it called for an investigation into Gates. Again, it quite clearly did not. And so you really need to ask yourself, who is going out of their way to say “ludicrous” and “newsworthy” things here?
That's quite dishonest. He's not attacking Gates. He's attacking a setup that allows 8 men control half of world's wealth
— Yanpol (@Yanpol17041974) January 16, 2017
well, yes… that concentration of wealth is grotesque. If Gates is giving it all away, he might agree.
— Yanpol (@Yanpol17041974) January 16, 2017
Get Involved!
– Support The Canary so we can keep holding the powerful to account.
–Read the Oxfam report yourself.
Featured image via screengrab
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
