• Donate
  • Login
Saturday, June 6, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

This shocking new law will imprison people for revealing inconvenient facts about the UK economy

James Wright by James Wright
13 February 2017
in UK
Reading Time: 4 mins read
161 12
A A
0
Home UK
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

The new Espionage Act could jail people for spreading leaked documents, under current proposals [pdf]. For the first time, a national security law would criminalise leaking “sensitive information” about the UK economy.

Prison for just obtaining the leaks

The Law Commission has drawn up the draft recommendations for the Espionage Act. They suggest [pdf p202] the prison sentence for leaked information should be expanded beyond whisteblowers themselves. As well as the person who leaks the information, anyone who obtains or passes it on would be liable for jail. Not only this, but the commission recommends extending the prison sentence. A legal expert said that the proposals would increase the maximum jail sentence from two to 14 years.

The Espionage Act would replace all previous legislation under the Official Secrets Acts.

Public interest doesn’t matter

In 326 pages on whistleblowing, the report does not once mention Edward Snowden or WikiLeaks. As revealed by Snowden, the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) indiscriminately collects data from every visible user on the internet. The programme was illegal for seven secretive years. Still, nobody has been prosecuted. May’s Investigatory Powers Act has now made the mass surveillance official government policy.

Snowden’s revelations uncovered government lawbreaking and huge privacy violations. The US government has never shown proof that the leaks brought any citizen into harms way. Despite all this, Snowden and the journalists who “obtained” the leaks would face imprisonment under the proposals. It doesn’t matter that Snowden is a US citizen because the punishment would apply to anyone, anywhere in the world.

The recommendations get more authoritarian the more you look at them. ‘Public interest’ would not be a legitimate defence against up to 14 years in prison. The commission advises against a statutory public interest defence. Instead, government employees can take any concerns to complaint services. So, under these proposals, people have no legal way to reveal ‘sensitive information’ to the public. No matter what the government is up to.

Manufacturing support?

The Law Commission claimed it consulted with media and rights organisations. But a number of these media outlets and human rights groups have said no such consultation took place. For example, Cathy James, the chief executive of Public Concern at Work, said:

I didn’t actually know we were listed in the document as we have been working our way through it so it is a big surprise to me… we were not consulted in the normal sense of the word consultation… We are very worried about the extent of the provision in the recommendations both for whistleblowers and public officials. It’s a huge backward step and we are very worried.

The Guardian expressed concern about yet another attack on press freedom from May’s government:

The proposals to threaten journalists and whistleblowers with draconian punishment, combined with powers just introduced in the [2016] Investigatory Powers Act to surveil journalists without their knowledge, represent a further attack on freedom of expression.

Jim Killock, the Chief Executive of Open Rights Group, said:

This is a full-frontal attack, recommending criminalising even examining secret services’ material. The intention is to stop the public from ever knowing that any secret agency has ever broken the law.

The recommendations would criminalise leaking or receiving ‘sensitive’ government material. They extend beyond national security and onto the UK economy. This means people could jailed for revealing May’s Brexit plans. Public interest? Apparently, that’s no longer relevant.

If these proposals go ahead, the government will escape accountability for immoral and illegal actions. The law would trample on our democracy.

Get Involved!

– The Law Commission wants to know what you think about the proposals. Contact it now.

– Support The Canary if you appreciate the work we do.

Featured image via screengrab

Tags: BrexitWikileaks
Share128Tweet80ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

History’s biggest ‘Piers Morgans’ – A catalogue of snivelling toadies

Next Post

REVEALED: the true extent of Tory human rights abuses is even worse than we thought

Next Post
DPAC Funeral

REVEALED: the true extent of Tory human rights abuses is even worse than we thought

Jeremy Corbyn blasts Theresa May for turning Brexit into The Hunger Games

Jeremy Corbyn blasts Theresa May for turning Brexit into The Hunger Games

GCHQ hackers

Britain launches cyber security centre, but fails to protect citizens from the biggest hackers of all

American fighter plane Afghanistan

New UN inquiry shows the US 'war on terror' is still terrorising the people it claims to be helping

James O'Brien

A caller drops a heartbreaking Brexit truthbomb on a stunned James O'Brien

Great march for gaza
Skwawkbox

Sectarians fling racist abuse at N Ireland’s charity Great March for Gaza

by Skwawkbox
6 June 2026
World Cup
Global

World Cup — Water bottle ban sparks controversy

by Alaa Shamali
6 June 2026
israel prison
Analysis

Even eyesight is restricted for Palestinian prisoners in Israel’s tortorous prisons

by Ben Marmarelli
6 June 2026
Orientalism
Explainer

Orientalism — What Edward Said can teach us about the US-Israeli war against Iran

by Tchanguize Mahmoodzadeh
6 June 2026
Palestine
Global

Palestine — Ministry of Health in financial crisis because of ‘Israel’

by Charlie Jaay
6 June 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart