This family has been driven out of Britain by love – and Home Office policy

Support us and go ad-free

Following a controversial court ruling affecting married couples from different nationalities, one woman has spoken out. She says the ludicrous policy serves no purpose but to keep her and her spouse apart, along with keeping potential tax revenue out of the UK.

Ludicrous or lawful?

On 22 February, the Supreme Court ruled [paywall] on a challenge that had been making its way up the judicial chain. A Home Office policy that states a person can sponsor a spouse only if they earn a minimum of £18,600.

The High Court found [paywall] the policy to be in violation of the human right to family life. But the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court have said [paywall] that the minimum income rule is lawful.

Designed [paywall] to prevent “burdens on the taxpayer and ensures migrant families can integrate into our communities”, opponents say it is a “disproportionate interference with a genuine spousal relationship”.

One person that has something to say about it is Saima Jaffrie. And she told The Canary her story.

Saima’s love story

A British citizen, Saima found love in India with an IT professional, Shafi, who was doing quite well for himself. They married in March 2015 and she stayed with him in India for six months. He was happy to move wherever Saima wanted. Working from home for a Swiss company, he visited clients at their sites across the world when the need arose.

As a citizen and with all of her family and friends there, Saima wanted to live in the UK. And with no need for recourse to public funds, they did not think this would be a problem. If anything, she’d be bringing in a high tax payer into Britain, who earned the equivalent of £70,000 a year.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

They both came to the UK in September 2015 – Shafi on a six month tourist visa. She completed the forms, but nothing on them or the Home Office website referenced her husband’s financial status. Only hers.

They had a baby in December 2015, and Shafi left the UK early, two weeks later, for a work visit, assuming the spouse visa would arrive. It was rejected. He applied for another tourist visa so he could return and see his wife and baby but that was also rejected.

According to Saima’s lawyers, his salary isn’t a factor. Saima must earn at least £18,600 per year, an amount that goes up to £22,500 when you have a child. As she says, finding a job on that salary may not have been a problem, but the rules also stipulate she must have held the position for six months. Only then could she apply, taking several months more.

With a newborn baby and limited child care options, they instead found a way to be together as soon as possible.


Saima describes this as a “horrible time”:

I had to leave everything behind. My family, friends. My husband could not even join me to help me pack. We spent around £2,500 on the application process.

I’ve had to start from scratch in Dubai and am yet to find a job. It’s not even the financial aspect. For my daughter, she’ll not really experience her birth country.

Saima still considers herself very fortunate and her lawyers advised her that the Home Office are turning many away. Rather than freeing the taxpayer from burden, she says she sees how it can force a woman, having to raise a child on her own, to rely on the welfare system without their spouse there to support her:

The Home Office are making policies with blinkers on. There is no process behind this type of rule. It doesn’t counter anything.

With so many couples fighting the system to be together, one has to question just what it is the Home Office is fighting back for.

Get Involved!

– Read more Canary articles on the Home Office and Immigration.

Featured image via Saima Jaffrie

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed