BBC Radio 4 presenter John Humphrys came under fire for his conduct on 7 March. Radio listeners accused Humphrys of “patronising” interviewing of Shadow Education Secretary Angela Rayner:
The palpable discomfort & disdain in the BBC's voice when a working class woman gets to top tier politics, is why @AngelaRayner is trending
— Paul Mason (@paulmasonnews) March 7, 2017
Free schools vs free speech?
Rayner was contextualising the government’s announcement of £500m in funding for so-called ‘free schools’:
When you look at the £3bn cuts that our current schools are facing, half a billion is a drop in the ocean. And not in the areas that we require it.
Read on...Support us and go ad-free
The money that’s on a vanity project with no evidence to suggest that it will help children move on from socially deprived backgrounds, I think it’s disgusting.
Then, Humphrys interrupted with an odd misconception of Rayner’s point:
Let me be clear – new schools are a vanity project, are they?
To which she firmly replied with the obvious:
No, the grammar school process is a vanity project…
Rayner continued to speak out against grammar schools:
It’s not about giving places to local children that need those schools. It’s about sucking money out of the current state public sector. These schools select, not the parents that select their children to go, it’s the school that will select the pupils
Humphrys then interrupted again with another misrepresentation of what Rayner was saying:
Nobody’s forced to send their child to a grammar school.
So she set the record straight. Again:
I’m not suggesting that people are forced to send their child to grammar schools. It’s quite the opposite of forcing a child to go to a grammar school. I’m saying that most children won’t get into them. It will make the education system worse for most of the children in our system. When our schools are facing significant cuts… This money on a vanity project is not what our schools need
The BBC presenter continued to interrupt Rayner. And social media users continued to point it out:
— Ian McNee (@IanSMcNee) March 7, 2017
Male? White? Middle class? Come on in!
Straight after speaking with her, people noticed a change in Humphry’s conduct as, now, Associate Editor of The Spectator Toby Young was on the line:
— 🍃🇪🇺FFFFF.. (@franjangle) March 7, 2017
Listeners were not impressed with Humphry’s performance on Radio 4. The BBC needs to take people from all walks of society seriously. And it definitely should not patronise the working class.
Support the work of new media organisations here. Please add more that you like in the comments.
Featured image via Screengrab/YouTube
Do your bit for independent journalism
Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.
We need you to help out, if you can.
When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.
You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.
In return you get:
- Advert free reading experience
- Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
- 20% discount from our shop