Independent Media | Campaigning Journalism
After that performance, anyone would think the BBC wants working-class women out of politics
BBC Radio 4 presenter John Humphrys came under fire for his conduct on 7 March. Radio listeners accused Humphrys of “patronising” interviewing of Shadow Education Secretary Angela Rayner:
The palpable discomfort & disdain in the BBC's voice when a working class woman gets to top tier politics, is why @AngelaRayner is trending
— Paul Mason (@paulmasonnews) March 7, 2017
Free schools vs free speech?
Rayner was contextualising the government’s announcement of £500m in funding for so-called ‘free schools’:
When you look at the £3bn cuts that our current schools are facing, half a billion is a drop in the ocean. And not in the areas that we require it.
She continued:
The money that’s on a vanity project with no evidence to suggest that it will help children move on from socially deprived backgrounds, I think it’s disgusting.
Then, Humphrys interrupted with an odd misconception of Rayner’s point:
Let me be clear – new schools are a vanity project, are they?
To which she firmly replied with the obvious:
No, the grammar school process is a vanity project…
Speaking out
Rayner continued to speak out against grammar schools:
It’s not about giving places to local children that need those schools. It’s about sucking money out of the current state public sector. These schools select, not the parents that select their children to go, it’s the school that will select the pupils
Humphrys then interrupted again with another misrepresentation of what Rayner was saying:
Nobody’s forced to send their child to a grammar school.
So she set the record straight. Again:
I’m not suggesting that people are forced to send their child to grammar schools. It’s quite the opposite of forcing a child to go to a grammar school. I’m saying that most children won’t get into them. It will make the education system worse for most of the children in our system. When our schools are facing significant cuts… This money on a vanity project is not what our schools need
The BBC presenter continued to interrupt Rayner. And social media users continued to point it out:
https://twitter.com/StarbarMurray/status/839028378388824064
Shame on #r4today: John Humphreys patronising, rude & ignoring @AngelaRayner's clear case for proper funding of schools for all children
— Ian McNee (@IanSMcNee) March 7, 2017
https://twitter.com/rowena_kay/status/839026998156668928
Male? White? Middle class? Come on in!
Straight after speaking with her, people noticed a change in Humphry’s conduct as, now, Associate Editor of The Spectator Toby Young was on the line:
#r4today if you showed the same toady respect for @AngelaRayner as you did to Toby Young we might get to hear some of her fluent good sense
— 🍃🇪🇺FFFFF.. (@franjangle) March 7, 2017
Listeners were not impressed with Humphry’s performance on Radio 4. The BBC needs to take people from all walks of society seriously. And it definitely should not patronise the working class.
Get Involved
Support the work of new media organisations here. Please add more that you like in the comments.
Featured image via Screengrab/YouTube
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?
Support us