The BBC is facing calls to apologise after Radio 4 host John Humphrys made remarks that even stunned the police.
During the Today programme on 6 March, Humphrys questioned whether Jo Cox’s murder was an act of terrorism. Despite the courts deeming it so. And, also, in the face of a top police chief claiming it so.
But apparently, Humphrys doesn’t agree. And commentators were quick to point out why.
BBC Today programme
Humphrys made the comments while speaking to the Assistant Commissioner at the National Police Chiefs’ Council, Mark Rowley, about the UK’s terror threat. During the interview, Rowley said:
Of course in the UK we do have to worry about… extreme right wing groups [which] are very provocative and can cause significant risk to our communities and, indeed, we know that extreme right wing related issues… led to the tragic murder of Jo Cox not that long ago.
But in that case wasn’t that just a very deeply disturbed man, mentally ill wasn’t he?
Read on...Support us and go ad-free
That slightly muddies the water doesn’t it when we talk about that as terrorism? I mean, that was a murder, wasn’t it?
Rowley was obviously taken aback. But he eventually replied:
Well it’s not my classification. That was the view of the court in the sentencing. That was the conclusion they came to.
Thomas Mair repeatedly stabbed and shot Cox in June 2016. A judge convicted Mair of her murder in November of the same year. The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said his crimes were “nothing less than acts of terrorism”. And the judge convicted him as a terrorist.
Also, psychiatrists found no evidence of diminished responsibility for his actions due to poor mental health. So it seems that it is Humphrys who is ‘muddying’ the facts. But commentators were quick to point out why:
Yes, that was an astounding comment from him. White males who kill people = mentally ill, non-whites who do the same = terrorists?
— Savage Houtkop (@SavageHoutkop) March 6, 2017
A shocking comment by John Humphrys on @BBCr4today revealing a biased outlook on this critical issue
— paul gannon (@paulgannonbike) March 6, 2017
The editor of openDemocracy‘s OurNHS, Caroline Molloy, subsequently sent a complaint to the BBC:
Here's the main complaint I've just sent to BBC about John Humphrys' ignorant terrorism comments. pic.twitter.com/YzocXvfGG7
— CarolineJMolloy (@carolinejmolloy) March 6, 2017
The BBC responded, saying it was “sorry” if Humphrys comments appeared “dismissive or patronising”. It also said that its listeners “expect challenging and robust questioning” on the Today programme. And it claimed it was “useful” to investigate what the police consider terrorism. Additionally, it asserted that Humphrys “was establishing whether the murder of Jo Cox MP should be equated to other recent terrorist attacks”.
Cox’s murder should, of course, be equated to other terrorist attacks. As the CPS and judge confirmed. But for some, terrorism is considered a very specific threat – from people who identify as Muslim.
Our divisive media and agenda-driven politicians have fuelled that view. One where the crimes ‘we’ commit have causes, but the crimes ‘they’ commit are just hateful. It’s the same worldview that suggests ‘our’ dead deserve respect, while ‘their’ dead can be ignored.
That alienates us from each other. And arguably, that’s largely the point. But it’s one that doesn’t sit well with some. As the response to Humphrys’ comments have shown.
– Learn more with Unite Against Fascism.
– Support The Canary if you appreciate the work we do.
Featured image via Tim Loudon/Flickr
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?