BBC Political Editor Laura Kuenssberg received a sharp rebuke for attempting to pass off Westminster gossip as ‘news’ about the proposed second referendum on Scottish independence.
Laura Kuenssberg and gossip
On 13 March, Kuenssberg tweeted that ‘sources’ had confirmed Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon would ask Scotland to ‘vote blind’ on independence. This means they would have to vote without knowing the terms of the UK’s Brexit deal. The tweet was shared over a thousand times, and became a popular story in the Westminster media. And it echoed the allegations of Conservative Prime Minister Theresa May.
It is also entirely false. Sturgeon has already confirmed the referendum would take place in 2018 or 2019, saying:
the vote must take place within a time frame to allow an informed choice to be made – when the terms of Brexit are clear but before the UK leaves the European Union, or shortly afterwards.
The SNP response
SNP MP Peter Grant challenged Kuenssberg, stating that the proposed dates of the referendum clearly refute this argument. This was her response:
And Grant makes an excellent point. Sharing every morsel of Westminster gossip that coincides with your editorial/personal view is not journalism.
It didn’t take long for others to share their views on the matter too.
pity BBC journos can't actually report on FM words, but invisible 'source' preferred
— Anne (@annewitha_e) March 13, 2017
It's a wild guess but I'm thinking Laura's source is Theresa May's press officer.
— Andrew Morton (@andrewgmorton) March 13, 2017
still nothing @bbclaurak? Honestly, be better at this journalism lark. Please. Try. From all of us the; 48% & 52%- PLEASE! 😒
— Le Gateau Chocolat (@LeGateauChoc) March 13, 2017
This is not the first time people have accused Kuenssberg of bias. In 2016, the BBC Trust found its Political Editor guilty of breaching rules of impartiality and accuracy when covering Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn.
Déjà vu for Scotland
This style of reporting will be achingly familiar for pro-independence voters in Scotland.
In 2014, Scotland voted narrowly to remain in the UK, with 45% voting ‘Yes’ (to leaving). But even The Telegraph admitted that ‘Project Fear’ [paywall] won the referendum. This refers to the strategy deployed by the media and political class opposed to independence. Namely, to blast voters with scaremongering stories until they voted ‘No’.
Two of the deciding factors in the referendum were Scotland’s place in the EU, and keeping the sterling currency. At the height of the campaign, then-Chancellor George Osborne told Scottish voters that they risked losing the pound if they left the union. Also, EU Commission President José Manuel Barroso claimed it would be “extremely difficult” for an independent Scotland to gain membership to the EU. These are both demonstrably false.
Following the Brexit vote, support for Scottish independence has reached its highest ever levels. This has triggered a second referendum, during which Project Fear will likely be deployed again. But memories may be fresh enough to weaken its impact this time round.
– Read more from The Canary on Brexit.
Featured image via Screengrab
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?