While the PM was embroiled in fake Easter egg news, the government quietly released another one of its initiatives to ‘help’ poor people. But, as is often the case, the scheme appears to be little more than an excuse to demonise whole sections of society.
A ‘Great’ what…?
On Tuesday 4 April, the government announced the start of its “Improving lives: Helping Workless Families” programme. The scheme is a follow-on to the controversial “Troubled Families” initiative. And its aim is to “improve outcomes for children who grow up in workless families and face multiple disadvantages”.
Work and Pensions Secretary Damian Green said of the scheme:
Heard it all before
The government plans to “help” workless families by [pdf p7]:
- Setting out the next phase of the Troubled Families Programme.
- Reducing parental conflict through the launch of an innovative new programme to support evidence-based interventions delivered by specialist organisations.
- Setting new expectations for Jobcentre Plus to identify people with complex needs at the right time.
- Tackling alcohol and drug dependency among parents and helping them back into employment.
It also says that [pdf p11]:
- 1.8 million children live in workless families.
- Work is the best route out of poverty.
- The employment rate for single parents has increased by 20% in the last two decades.
- Educationally, children from workless families generally do worse than those from lower-income ones.
But while this all sounds positive, the government’s track record on helping the poorest families tells a different story.
The Troubled Families Programme was heavily criticised. It cost £1.3bn to implement; and aimed to ‘turn around’ the lives of 117,000 families involved in crime or anti-social behaviour. But an official analysis declared that there was:
no evidence the Troubled Families Programme had any significant impact on key objectives… [it had]no significant or systemic impact on outcomes related to employment, job seeking, school attendance, or anti-social behaviour
One of the report’s authors, Jonathon Portes, wrote that the key issue is:
the government’s deliberate misrepresentation of the data and statistics… translated into a funding model that could have been designed to waste money.
Also, contrary to both the Troubled Families and Helping Workless Families programmes’ claims, work is not the “best route out of poverty”.
Figures show that more than 14 million people in the UK now live in relative poverty; while officially only 1.6 million people are unemployed. And the number of children in poverty rose by 400,000 from 2010/11 to 2015/16. Meaning there are now four million children living in poverty. And a staggering 66% of those are in working households.
Meanwhile, as the government claims it wants to help families with addiction issues, a third of NHS trusts have cut alcohol and drug treatment services. And when the government calls for more families to go into work, it never factors in the issue of time poverty, which was last estimated to affect one in 15 children. But it also ignores the flourishing ‘gig economy’, which has seen more than 1.3 million people end up in casual, part-time work with no guaranteed hours or employment rights.
If the government was serious about tackling worklessness and its effect on children, it could do a number of things. It could: make the National Living Wage a real living wage; tackle exploitative employers; end university tuition fees; and stop punishing those who can’t work by slashing welfare payments.
But this would seem to be too obvious for the current government. And it wouldn’t, or course, have the apparently desired effect of demonising the poorest people in society.
– Read more from The Canary on poverty.
Featured image via Flickr
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?