On the Andrew Marr Show, Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell laid out the bottom line in front of millions. A bottom line that the Conservative machine wants the electoral narrative to stay well away from:
Anyone earning below £80,000, we’ll be guaranteeing you will not have an increase in income tax or VAT, or national insurance contributions. And for those above £80,000, we’re asking them to pay a modest bit more to fund our public services.
The Labour Party has ruled out tax rises for the 95% of UK earners who earn less than £80,000 per year. And McDonnell says the party will use the “modest” tax hikes from those who earn more to fund our public services.
Public services, such as the NHS, rail infrastructure and social housing, are the backbone of the UK economy and facilitate economic growth.
Failing to properly invest in UK people and institutions raises national debt in the long-term. Indeed, for every £1 spent on flood defences, for example, the taxpayer saves £8 in reducing later economic damage. That’s why the Conservatives have proportionately piled on more public debt than every Labour government in history combined. Even the conservative International Monetary Fund (IMF) has admitted that austerity economics has brought dreadful results.
Many people would consider lower taxes the key reason to vote Tory. But Andrew Neil put that myth to bed on the BBC. Grilling the Conservative Party Chairman, he said:
Except that you haven’t reduced the tax burden, have you? As a percentage of the GDP, which is the best way to measure the tax burden, it’s now going to reach its highest level since the mid 1980s, which I’d point out was when Conservatives were in power. The tax burden in this country, under your government, is rising.
Contrary to economic folklore, the Conservative government is on course to raise taxes to their highest level in 30 years. And back in 1987, Margaret Thatcher was in power.
How can we trust Labour?
Meanwhile, the Labour Party has pledged not raising taxes for 95% of UK earners. But how can Labour be trusted? Tony Blair’s rhetoric on privatisation, for example, didn’t match reality. As Richard Seymour wrote in The Guardian:
New Labour had made electoral capital out of the Tories’ unpopularity over privatisation, but only pledged to stop the sell-off of air traffic control. Even this minor promise was betrayed.
private donations from wealthy figures have failed to materialise
This is important because a party’s funding influences its policy. Former major Conservative donor Stuart Wheeler once insisted that “people who make large donations to political parties expect to gain influence and shape future policy”.
A Labour Party funded by the millions is much more likely to deliver for the majority of people. And Corbyn’s actions have matched his rhetoric throughout his political career.
On the Marr Show, McDonnell laid out the facts for the British people. If you’re one of the 95% who earns less than £80,000, you don’t need to chip in any more than you already do. But the higher-earners disproportionately benefiting from a society that depends on public infrastructure such as roads, firefighters, police and the NHS, will contribute a “modest” amount more. Don’t let the Tory machine distract from that bottom line.
Watch the clip here:
– Register to vote in the 8 June general election. If you don’t have a national insurance number, a 5 minute phone call on 0300 200 3500 will get it sent to you in ten days.
– Discuss the key policy issues with family members, colleagues and neighbours. And organise! Join (and participate in the activities of) a union, an activist group, and/or a political party.
– Also read more Canary articles on the 2017 general election.
Featured image via Youtube
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?