The Telegraph overlooked one very embarrassing detail with its ‘back to the 1970s’ threat

The Daily Telegraph
Support us and go ad-free

The Daily Telegraph completely lost the plot on 10 May over the leaked draft of Labour’s manifesto which, it said, threatened to “take Britain back to [the] 1970s”. But as the paper went into freak-out mode, it overlooked one very embarrassing detail.


The paper was seemingly attempting to bring fear into the hearts of its readers by saying Labour would take them back to the 70s. But one of its previous articles seems to undermine the suggestion that going back to the 70s would be such a terrible thing.

In the article, titled Remember 1976? Britain’s best ever year, the paper notes that:

1976 was the best on record for quality of life, according to a report published by the New Economics Foundation, a think-tank.

The New Economics Foundation claims to be “independent of political parties and special interests”, and to “rely on a broad cross section of individuals, charities, companies and public sector funders to undertake [its] work”.

The Telegraph goes on to explain how Surrey University’s Prof Tim Jackson thought that Britain in 1976 was “better off than it is today”. This was in part because there was “less crime and lower energy consumption”, but also:

because of a fall in income inequality and a rise in the national capital stock thanks to a boom in public sector investment

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

And while there had been obvious improvements since the era, such as a higher life expectancy and technological progress, Jackson suggested that many people just think they’re better off today because they want to believe they are. But he insisted:

If we are relying for growth on an economy with rising crime, growing inequality and the destruction of the environment, that’s not a very good way to proceed… There is this comforting myth that things are getting better but there has been a flatness in the index of quality of life for years. We all want to say we’re better off. But then there are the hidden costs of climate change that we may not have to face until the future.

Where are we heading?

As with all decades, the 70s were definitely not without their problems (which we won’t seek to list here). But if The Telegraph dislikes the decade so much, why publish an article saying that it included “Britain’s best ever year”? And which particular parts of the decade does it really hate? The fall in income inequality? The public sector investment? Lower levels of crime and energy consumption? Or perhaps, as many Twitter users have pointed out, the fact that housing was affordable, jobs were more secure, and education was free?

But then The Telegraph is, after all, owned by billionaires (who the BBC once called “the tax haven twins”). And former chief political commentator Peter Oborne has accused it of “placing what it perceives to be the interests of a major international bank above its duty to bring the news to [its] readers”. And it has consistently apologised for repressive dictators and human rights abusers.

So maybe it should come as no surprise that the paper is acting like Labour’s leaked (and unfinished) manifesto will mean Armageddon for the whole of Britain. In spite of the document saying that, while there’ll be a tax hike for both big business and very high earners, there’ll be no tax increases for 95% of workers. And in spite of the party’s plans for the ownership of key public services to become more democratic and less concentrated in the hands of a few powerful companies.

Perhaps The Telegraph just thinks fairness and democracy are ‘soft’ 70s values, and that Britain should look instead to values from, say, Victorian Britain. Who knows? Either way, it’s embarrassing itself. And it would be hilarious to watch if the future of our country wasn’t at stake.

Get Involved!

Register to vote in the 8 June general election. If you don’t have a national insurance number, a 5 minute phone call on 0300 200 3500 will get it sent to you in ten days.

– Discuss the key policy issues with family members, colleagues and neighbours. And organise! Join (and participate in the activities of) a union, an activist group, and/or a political party.

– Also read more Canary articles on the 2017 general election.

– Read and support independent media outlets that hold the powerful to account:

The Canary, Media Diversified, Novara Media, Corporate Watch, Red Pepper, New InternationalistCommon Space, Media Lens, Bella CaledoniaVox Political, Evolve Politics, Real Media, Reel News, STRIKE! magazine,The Bristol CableThe Meteor, Salford Star, The Ferret.

Featured image via Wikimedia Commons

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed