The BBC just changed a headline to make it less critical of Theresa May’s government

BBC GE2017 rail
Support us and go ad-free

Astute readers noticed that the BBC changed a headline of a story on Friday 19 May, to make it less critical of the government. But then later appeared to change it back to the original.

A tale of two headlines

The story, authored by Hugh Pym, reports that the government has chosen to delay the release of key performance data on the NHS until after the 8 June general election. It reads:

Regulator NHS Improvement had wanted to publish data on the scale of hospital deficits but was advised against it by the government.

NHS Improvement said it was “disappointing” the results could not be published until after the election.

The first version of the story bore the headline:

But just a short while later, the headline was transformed to the notably milder:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Although the BBC did later revert to the original headline, it is not the first time the BBC has faced allegations of bias during or before the general election.

BBC Bias

In January, the BBC Trust found chief political editor Laura Kuenssberg guilty of misreporting an interview with Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn. Their ruling stated:

The breach of due accuracy on such a highly contentious political issue meant that the output had not achieved due impartiality.

But Kuenssberg was not censured by her boss at BBC News. Former Murdoch journalist James Harding (now Head of News at the BBCrejected the findings, stating that:

While we respect the Trust and the people who work there, we disagree with this finding

BBC News reported on the leader of the opposition in the same way it would any other politician. It is striking that the Trust itself said there was ‘no evidence of bias’. Indeed, it also said the news report was ‘compiled in good faith’. The process is now concluded and BBC News formally notes the Trust’s finding.

Not only did Harding refuse to censure Kuenssberg, he applauded her. Praising her as:

an outstanding journalist and political editor with the utmost integrity and professionalism.

Multiple studies have established the problem of Conservative bias in BBC News. A 2013 content analysis of the BBC by Cardiff University found that:

  • The BBC consistently grants more airtime to the Conservatives, whichever party is in power.
  • On BBC News at Six, business representatives outnumbered trade union spokespeople by more than 5:1 in 2007 and by 19:1 in 2012.
  • BBC coverage of the 2008 financial crisis was dominated by stockbrokers, investment bankers, hedge fund managers and other City voices. Civil society voices or commentators critical of the finance sector were almost completely absent from coverage.

Meanwhile, studies by the London School of Economics and the Media Reform Coalition have since found a serious imbalance in reporting of Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn across the media.

Enough is enough

The BBC, unlike private broadcasters, has a duty to deliver impartial news coverage to its millions of license fee payers. It is patently failing at this task. And just weeks from a general election, this failure could come at a very high price for the UK electorate.

Get Involved!

Register to vote in the 8 June general election.

– Discuss the key policy issues with family members, colleagues and neighbours. And organise! Join (and participate in the activities of) a union, an activist group, and/or a political party.

Read more from The Canary on the 2017 general election.

– Read and support news outlets who hold the powerful to account. Here are some we recommend. Please add more that you like in the comments:

The Canary, Media Diversified, Novara Media, Corporate Watch, Common Space, Media Lens, Bella Caledonia,Vox Political, Evolve Politics, Real Media, Reel News, STRIKE! magazine, The Bristol CableThe Meteor, Salford Star, The Ferret.

Featured image via Flickr Creative Commons

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed