On Monday 29 May, Victoria Derbyshire hosted an election debate live from Dunstable on the BBC. Alongside 120 audience members, she was also joined by Conservative parliamentary candidate Dominic Raab, the SNP’s John Nicolson, and Labour’s Emily Thornberry. Raab took this opportunity to highlight why he thinks so many more people need to use food banks. And it’s not because they’ve been forced into poverty. It’s because they’ve got “cash flow” problems.
A former solicitor in the City, Raab is now the defending candidate for Esher and Walton. Among other ‘core convictions’, Raab believes in “more free speech and less political correctness for a healthier democracy” and “more ladders of opportunity, so youngsters from any background can be successful”. But this ‘free speech’ landed him in some seriously hot water when he claimed the majority of people who use food banks just have ‘cash flow’ problems.
He even twisted data from the Trussell Trust to back up his argument:
During a section on the economy, an audience member asked why so many people are using food banks under this Tory government. Raab responded:
In terms of the food bank issue – and I’ve studied the Trussell Trust data – what they tend to find is the typical user of a food bank is not someone that’s languishing in poverty, it’s someone who has a cash flow problem episodically.
The audience then burst into shouts and jeers, forcing Raab to add:
No, it’s true… That is what the Trussell Trust data says.
Nicolson then said:
The Trussell Trust would be outraged by you saying that.
To which Raab said: “No they wouldn’t”. After Nicolson demanded a clarification, Raab said he came to this ‘conclusion’ using the data the charity keeps on the reasons why people come to its food banks.
According to the Trussell Trust, between April and September 2016 519,342 three-day emergency food parcels were distributed to people in crisis, including 188,500 to children. That’s 406,078 more food parcels than those distributed between April and September 2012.
The most common reason people used a food bank in 2016 was because there was a delay in their benefits payment (27.45%). But this was only slightly above the 24.94% of people forced to use a food bank because of a low income.
For Raab to use this marginal difference to claim most people use these services because of a “cash flow problem” is not only a huge injustice but also distracts from the real problem. Using such a term also infers the user has a problem with managing their own finances, when in fact it is the government’s fault for delaying benefit payments.
A combination of reasons
When you compare the Trust’s data taken from 2015 and 2016, you can see the real reason. The number of people needing to use food banks because of low income increased by 2.59% from 2015 to 2016. Likewise, the number of people using it because of changes to their benefits increased by 2.44%. The people with delays to their payments actually decreased:
The Trussell Trust also issued this statement:
— The Trussell Trust (@TrussellTrust) May 29, 2017
Many took to Twitter to share their outrage at Raab’s comments and remind the nation why they won’t be voting Tory on 8 June:
This MP is out of touch and has no place, IMO, in representing people when he has no understanding of what is happening. #VoteToriesOut
— Wattle Publishing (@wattlepub) May 30, 2017
i have a terminal degenerative condition and have had to turn to your food banks. tories are cruel &don't care about poverty traps
— julie agnes forshaw (@JulieAForshaw) May 29, 2017
Dominic Raab couldn't even bring himself to look that woman as he knows the Tories welfare reforms is killing people. #VictoriaLive
— Jack McKelvie 🎗 (@JackMcKelvie) May 29, 2017
Raab’s comments proved just how out of touch he is with reality. The Trussell Trust is experiencing unprecedented demand for its services because vulnerable people are struggling to survive in this low wage, exploitative society. The fact that Raab dismissed this as just a problem with “cash flow” goes to show the lengths to which he and the Conservative government will go to pass off the responsibility.
– Go out and vote on 8 June.
– Read more from The Canary on the 2017 general election.
– Read and support independent news outlets that hold the powerful to account. Here are some we recommend. Please add more that you like in the comments:
The Canary, Media Diversified, Novara Media, Corporate Watch, Common Space, Media Lens, Bella Caledonia, Vox Political, Evolve Politics, Real Media, Reel News, STRIKE! magazine, The Bristol Cable, The Meteor,Salford Star, The Ferret.
Featured image via YouTube
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?