In the face of a growing backlash, Conservative MPs are being wheeled out across the media to try and justify their deal with the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP). It’s not a cash-for-votes bribe, they insist. It’s about doing the right thing and investing in a deprived Northern Ireland.
But one MP got more than he bargained for when he appeared on the BBC‘s Victoria Derbyshire show on 27 June. A fellow guest on the show, introduced only as “Elliot”, cut through the rhetoric to expose the extreme hypocrisy of the Conservatives’ argument:
Northern Ireland has not become deprived overnight. It has been deprived for the entire time you have been in government.
So why is it suddenly now, when Theresa May needs to cling on to power… Why now, after seven years of power, are you so interested in injecting £1bn of public money – it’s not Conservative money, it is public money – that could be distributed to mental health nurses, to schools, to public sectors?
Elliot went on to answer his own question:
Because you want to cling to power. Because you have got a woman who does not understand the electorate, does not understand the message she’s been given by the public. She has now bribed the Northern Irish Assembly with a billion pounds to keep her into [sic] power. Justify that for me now, please.
The £1.5bn deal, with £1bn of new money, will see Northern Ireland – which already receives more funding per head than any other part of the UK – receive an extra £530 of funding per person over the next two years. It has provoked an intense backlash across Britain – particularly in Wales and Scotland, which won’t see comparable rises in their own funding.
First Minister of Wales Carwyn Jones called it a “straight bung”. Plaid Cymru’s Leanne Wood called it “a bribe”. And Nicola Sturgeon, First Minister of Scotland, described it as “a grubby, shameless deal”.
Faced with the facts, Cleverly argued that:
Northern Ireland has some of the most significant issues because of its history. You mentioned mental health services. It has the highest suicide rate per capita in the whole of the UK. And it’s entirely appropriate that we recognise the unique circumstances of Northern Ireland.
That’s all very admirable… But if you were doing it off your own back… if you’d won this election and you’d turned round and said, ‘D’you know what? Northern Ireland is so deprived, we need to invest immediately because it’s… a terrible place.’ But that’s not what’s happened.
If you’d have won a majority, £1bn would not be going to the Northern Irish Assembly. It just wouldn’t be happening. Because it wouldn’t be your priority, because at the moment your priority is clinging to power at the detriment of this country. You’re an affront to this country.
Cleverly was eventually forced to admit the obvious: that the Conservatives are spending money on Northern Ireland to keep Jeremy Corbyn out of Downing Street:
I have absolutely no doubt that a government led by Jeremy Corbyn would have been a catastrophe for this government [sic]. And that’s why… we have entered into an agreement with another political party in the UK to form a stable government.
'Why are you spending £1billion of public money just to cling on to power?
Elliot challenges Tory MP over Cons-DUP deal. pic.twitter.com/HWhIIs4twE
— Victoria Derbyshire (@VictoriaLIVE) June 27, 2017
The deal with the DUP is about keeping the Conservatives in power, plain and simple. To suggest it was in any way motivated by a desire to reduce Northern Ireland’s horrifying suicide rates is cynicism of the highest order. So well played, Elliot, for exposing the government’s hypocrisy for the whole country to see.
– Join The Canary, so we can continue to work for the people, not the powerful.
Featured image via screengrab
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?