The International Trade Secretary Liam Fox has claimed the BBC would “rather see Britain fail than see Brexit succeed”. The accusation has led to criticism from some, and an attempt by Downing Street to distance itself from his comments. The remarks are notably similar to both President Trump’s attacks on the media, and the recent case of Andrea Leadsom saying broadcasters should “be a bit patriotic”.
Speaking in the House of Commons on Thursday 6 July, Fox said:
It does appear that some elements of our media would rather see Britain fail than see Brexit succeed. And I cannot recall a single time in recent times when I have seen good economic news that the BBC didn’t describe as ‘despite Brexit’.
Several politicians criticised Fox. These included Alistair Carmichael, the Liberal Democrat chief whip, who said:
A government minister attacking the media in this way is a dangerous and misplaced intervention. Mr Fox should get on with the work of government rather than trying to deflect from the failings of his department. It is extraordinary that Mr Fox feels it is appropriate to attack the media. He looks like Donald Trump without the perma-tan.
He may, of course, be trying to distract us from the official data today that shows the number of jobs created by foreign investment fell by 9% last year.
Fox also attracted some criticism online:
I think some elements of the cabinet would rather see Liam Fox fail that Brexit proceed https://t.co/EeMUxpzibp
— Sam Coates Times (@SamCoatesTimes) July 6, 2017
Some elements in our Government would rather see Britain fail than abandon their own ideological position https://t.co/PtWainODH0
— robert shrimsley (@robertshrimsley) July 6, 2017
Most of us would rather see Brexit Fail than Britain Fail
— Jon Hannah 🔸 #FBPE #The760000 #Peoplesvote (@JCHannah77) July 6, 2017
— Andrew Smith (@thesmiggs) July 6, 2017
It’s no secret that much of the UK media has one bias or another. The theoretically impartial BBC is not exempt from that, as academic studies have shown. But the issue isn’t so much Fox’s criticism as his political position and his language. Because when Trump describes the media as ‘enemies of the people’; when Leadsom suggests broadcasters are not “patriotic”; when Fox suggests that the BBC wants Britain to “fail” – this taps into a vein of politics that is more reminiscent of Stalinist Russia.
In fact, the phrase “enemy of the people” was actually criticised by the Cold War leader of the Soviet Union, Nikita Khrushchev, who said:
it eliminated the possibility of any kind of ideological fight.
And that it:
‘was specifically introduced for the purpose of physically annihilating such individuals’ who disagreed with the supreme leader.
There is mistrust of the media from some quarters when it comes to Brexit. Partly because the prediction that a Leave vote would lead to an instant recession did not materialise. And as recently as 5 July, a group of cross-party MPs met with the BBC to discuss bias. One complaint came from a study that showed BBC Radio 4 Today‘s business slot had three times more Remainers than Brexiteers.
This is an interesting issue. Slightly more than 50% of the UK voted for Brexit. But is it more balanced to split coverage equally between Remainers/Brexiteers, or by the percentage of criticism/support that exists?
A comparison is with climate change. Because when you have one climate scientist arguing with a climate sceptic, it gives the impression that both sides are equally weighted. In reality though, the vast majority of scientists agree that man-made climate change is a real issue.
It’s certainly true that both Brexiteers and Remainers deserve a voice. We live in a democracy for one and, secondly, Brexiteers won the referendum. As several prominent Brexiteers are in government, though, it seems unlikely that their voices will be ignored. Especially as they are literally the people who will be in the Brexit negotiations.
There are signs that some Brexiteers would rather there were no dissenting voices at all, though. A message that was best captured by The Daily Mail‘s CRUSH THE SABOTEURS front page. And it’s a message Fox himself seems in sync with.
– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.
– Read and support other independent media outlets that hold the powerful to account.
Media Diversified, Novara Media, Corporate Watch, Red Pepper, New Internationalist, Common Space, Media Lens, Bella Caledonia, Vox Political, Evolve Politics, Real Media, Reel News, STRIKE! magazine, The Bristol Cable, The Meteor, Salford Star, The Ferret.
Featured image via Wikimedia
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?