The full extent of how children are suffering under Conservative austerity has been revealed. And it shows that, while the average cost of raising a child has spiralled to over £187,000 for a single parent, for the first time since WWII the government is failing to provide its most basic duty of care to them; meaning that some children are falling nearly 40% short of the most basic requirements for living.
The Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG) has released its annual The Cost of a Child report [pdf]. And it said that, after a “short period of stability”, the price of raising a family is once again increasing. It found that:
- The “basic” cost [pdf p11] of raising one child (average cost of first and second child) is £75,436 for a couple or £102,627 for a lone parent. These are above-inflation increases [pdf p12] on 2016.
- If you factor in childcare costs, council tax and rent, this goes up [pdf p11] to £155,142 and £187,120 respectively.
- The cost [pdf p18] just for a first child to a lone parent is £205,764
The CPAG report also found that many parents’ incomes do not even cover the “basic” cost. Because after taking out childcare, council tax and rent, an unemployed couple only had enough money to cover 58% of the £75,436 CPAG says [pdf p11] it costs to raise a child:
CPAG was damning in its assessment of the Tories’ austerity-driven welfare cuts. Because it said:
For the first time in post-war history, these cost increases are not being matched by increases in support given to families from the state. While this policy persists, the struggle that low-income families face to make ends meet will become steadily harder.
But behind the CPAG figures are clear indicators that families which can least afford it are being hit the hardest.
Abandoning your child
CPAG found that, while the “basic” cost of raising a child for couples had fallen since 2012, it had increased [pdf p13] for lone parents by 16.2%. And while the full cost had increased [pdf p13] for both couples and lone parents (by 8.7% and 20.7% respectively), welfare payments are slowly covering less and less:
- Lone parents have been hit the hardest: child benefit and child tax credit now only cover [pdf p15] 69.2% of the “basic” child-rearing costs, a 9.1% fall since 2012. And if the lone parent is out of work, full benefits now only cover [pdf p15] 60.4% of the “basic” cost, a fall of 3% since 2012.
- A couple both on the ‘national living wage’ only earn [pdf p17] 86.8% of the “basic” cost of raising a child; for lone parents this figure is 81.5%.
On the Tories’ heads
But CPAG was clear where part of the blame for the spiralling cost of child-rearing lies. One of the report’s authors, Donald Hirsch, told The New Statesman that the government’s:
failure to uprate either benefits, tax credits or the wage levels at which tax credits are withdrawn means that inflation is bound to erode modest family incomes both in and out of work. The gradual fall in living standards that this produces will be worsened by other benefit cuts that come in over the next few years…
And he concluded that:
For those relying on benefits as a “safety net” when they are not working, the level of this net is being progressively lowered over time.
There comes a point when a “safety net” stops being worthy of its name because it is no longer enough to provide even the bare essentials of modern life. The evidence shows that when income sinks this low, most families can only escape severe material hardship either by going into debt or by getting help from extended family members.
The CPAG report comes amid food bank charities warning that thousands of children are going hungry over the holidays. But moreover, 3.9 million children (one in four) now live in poverty. And with summer childcare costs at record levels, the CPAG report paints yet another bleak picture for the future of children in the UK.
– Support CPAG.
– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?