There’s an elephant in the room on police funding, and we urgently need to talk about it [OPINION]

Support us and go ad-free

On 22 September, the head of the National Police Chiefs’ Council, Sara Thornton, spoke out about terrorism funding for the police. Thornton claimed that:

The current level of terrorism, added to the strain and stress the force is already under, is causing real problems and is frankly unsustainable.

But there’s an elephant in the room that needs to be addressed. Part of the role of the National Counter Terrorism Police Operations Centre is to police domestic extremism. In other words, potentially millions of pounds are being wasted monitoring and collating information on protesters.

Domestic extremism

There is no legal definition of domestic extremism. But in 2014, the Metropolitan Police defined it as:

Domestic Extremism relates to the activity of groups or individuals who commit or plan serious criminal activity motivated by a political or ideological viewpoint.

Although no definition is given of “serious criminal activity”, the kind of groups it covers are well documented. Fracking protesters, for example, are regularly highlighted in the government’s Prevent training as potential extremists.

Other examples of who the police consider extremists include Baroness Jenny Jones from the Green Party and the comedian Mark Thomas. And the police have also faced criticism for keeping domestic extremist files on journalists who cover protest issues.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Speaking to The Canary, Kevin Blowe, Coordinator of the Network for Police Monitoring (Netpol), said:

The police are always keen to suggest their budgets for counter-terrorism spending are simply for stopping bomb plots, because obviously nobody can object to that. But it also covers so-called ‘domestic extremism’; the targeting of legitimate campaigners based simply on their political views; the constant surveillance of demonstrations and the maintenance of secret, unaccountable databases.

Blowe continued:

There is a growing body of opinion that is questioning why the police are involved in this kind of activity at all and Netpol calls for the national domestic extremism unit to close down.

It’s time for a rethink

But it’s not just counter-terrorism and domestic extremism. During the general election, the ongoing battle for more funding for the police reached a peak. The police repeatedly pointed to a variety of societal problems that are pushing resources to breaking point. Examples included people suffering mental health crises, the drug ‘spice‘, knife crime and, not for the first time, terrorism.

And Blowe believes that while these are all important issues for our communities, we need to start questioning whether funding the police is the best answer:

There is little critical assessment about whether more funding for the police is a greater priority than less reactive, less violent and less coercive responses that make a genuine impact in the long-term. More surveillance, more armed officers, more arrests and more imprisonment are not working and are not making us feel any safer. For vulnerable people with mental health problems like James Herbert, who died in police custody following violent restraint, more funding for access to mental health professionals seems like a far more pressing priority than more police officers.

It’s time for a serious rethink about the debate on police funding and the function that policing has in our society. Simply throwing more money at the police force or employing more officers will not do this. And if the police are seriously worried about how to fund counter-terrorism, there’s a simple option; stop monitoring protesters and scrap the domestic extremism units.

Get Involved!

Support Netpol

Featured image via author’s own

This article was updated on 22 September to correct billions to millions regarding the amount of money the police could save. 

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed