May and Corbyn just spoke at the same event but their responses to the Paradise Papers couldn’t be more different [VIDEO]
On 6 November, Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn both addressed the same conference. But their responses to a tax haven investigation – the so-called Paradise Papers – couldn’t have been more different. Because unlike May, who completely avoided the issue, Corbyn tackled it head on. And he likened people and companies who use offshore tax havens to leeches.
Another year, another leak
The Paradise Papers is an investigation by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ). It details the offshore tax affairs of more than 120 politicians and leaders and over 100 corporations. The ICIJ investigation came about after a leak of millions of documents from offshore law firm Appleby. Prominent individuals using offshore tax havens, revealed by the ICIJ, include the Queen, close allies of US President Donald Trump, Conservative Party donor Lord Ashcroft, and a host of multinational firms including Apple and Nike.
But when May and Corbyn spoke at the annual Confederation of British Industry (CBI) conference, their approach to the Paradise Papers was completely different.
Corbyn said [0:01]:
The shocking revelations from the Paradise Papers… yet again of widespread tax avoidance and evasion on an industrial scale, must lead to decisive action and real change.
He went on to say [0:44] that government investment can “only be delivered by fair taxation”. And he noted [1:02] that:
We also have a duty to come down hard on those who are avoiding their responsibilities, and give Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [HMRC] the resources it needs… We need a full public inquiry into tax avoidance and evasion…
Corbyn concluded by saying [2:00] that the Paradise Papers showed:
tens of billions that are effectively being leeched off our public services by a super rich elite that holds the taxation system and the rest of us in contempt…
But just a few hours earlier, May only mentioned the Paradise Papers when questioned by a journalist.
The Guardian‘s Jessica Elgot put it to May that [0:02]:
David Cameron said aggressive tax avoidance was ‘not morally acceptable’, and you said you want an economy that works not just for the privileged few. So will you finish that work and insist that British tax havens create public registers of who owns offshore companies and trusts. And will you announce a public inquiry into aggressive tax avoidance?
May said [0:27]:
We have been continuing the work that David Cameron started, and he started it not just for the UK but on an international stage… we have seen more revenues coming to HMRC… £160bn extra that they have been able to raise… but… there’s already work that’s been done to ensure that we see greater transparency in… our dependencies and British overseas territories.
She concluded by saying [1:08]:
We want people to pay the tax that is due.
Not just the Paradise Papers
May did not commit to taking further action on tax havens. But there is one notable reason for the difference in May and Corbyn’s speeches. And it’s that numerous Conservative Party donors are linked to tax havens.
As The Canary previously reported, Tory donors and supporters named in the ICIJ’s previous tax haven investigation, the Panama Papers, included:
- Sir Keith Mills.
- Rocco Forte.
- Sir Nigel Rudd.
- The Folkes family.
- Aidan Heavey.
- The Barclay Brothers, owners of The Telegraph.
And now, the ICIJ has named Tory donor Lord Ashcroft in the Paradise Papers.
May’s hands are effectively tied on tax havens. Because while her party accepts money from the same people Cameron referred to as “not morally acceptable”, she will continue to ring her hands and do absolutely nothing.
Watch Corbyn’s full speech here:
– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.