Talk of a supposed coup by Momentum is actually covering up something far more worrying

Momentum
Support us and go ad-free

Recent developments in a Labour-run council have sparked a bitter feud within the Labour Party. And campaign group Momentum has been accused of a coup of sorts. But at the heart of this story is something far more worrying. It’s the fact that a Labour-run council was trying to push through a largely unwanted privatisation deal – one which could seriously reduce the available homes for the existing community.

Democracy or coup?

In the Labour-run north London council of Haringey, 17 councillors have either lost their seats in open contests or have withdrawn as candidates in the borough’s selection race. This included three councillors from the same ward standing down on Sunday 3 December. In a letter, they said:

The current climate of Haringey Labour politics feels factional and poisonous – anger, cynicism and distrust now shape too many debates within the local party.

They also suggested they would not be judged with an “open mind” or “in a fair manner”.

Former deputy Labour leader Roy Hattersley referred to the debacle as “subversion”; and he said that Momentum, a campaign group close to Jeremy Corbyn, was the biggest crisis facing the Labour Party. Guardian journalist Owen Jones, however, called the process “democracy”.

The real story 

But local resident Phil Jackson wrote an article in The Independent headlined Momentum isn’t staging a coup in Haringey, this is about housing not Labour factions. He said the situation was not about different groupings within the Labour Party, but about the Haringey Development Vehicle (HDV). The HDV is a public-private partnership to build new homes, shops and public spaces, involving Australian property giant Lendlease.

This ‘Local Asset Backed Vehicle’ represents the biggest [pdf, p13] such transfer of property assets from any council in the UK.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

And there’s been wide support to stop the deal in its tracks since December 2016.

What’s the deal?

Previous evaluations of the HDV have suggested that it would be financially risky; that there would be little scrutiny around the activities of the HDV; and that residents and members of the council had not had sufficient time to look at all of the detail around the deal.

There were also concerns that there would not be enough social housing to replace demolished council property. So some residents might not be able to stay in the borough.

Also, HDV partner Lendlease previously built 2,469 homes on the site of South London’s Heygate Estate. But it only made 80 available for social rent. It also paid $56m in fines in “the largest construction-fraud settlement in New York City history”. And it reportedly fitted non-compliant cladding and faulty plumbing in two separate hospitals in Australia.

Therefore, the actions of Momentum shouldn’t worry Labour members. Or anyone else. The fact that a Labour council is trying to push through a potentially ill-considered and unwanted privatisation deal is, in fact, a much more worrying scenario.

Get Involved!

– Read more Canary articles on Labour, Momentum and housing.

Featured image via Flickr – Funk Dooby

Support us and go ad-free

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop

 

The Canary Fund us

Comments are closed