Labour’s Laura Pidcock just secured a crucial debate in parliament. Here’s what she wants you to know.

Laura Pidcock PIP
Steve Topple

On 31 January, Labour’s Laura Pidcock will be holding a debate in parliament. It concerns one of the more contentious issues of government policy. And the MP for North West Durham has told The Canary that she wants the voices of the people who feel “degraded” by the system to be heard.

Personal Independence Payments

The Personal Independence Payment (PIP) is a welfare entitlement from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). It was rolled out gradually in 2013 to replace the Disability Living Allowance (DLA). The then-Coalition government said the change would reduce costs by 20%. But ever since, PIP has been dogged by controversy. This includes the UN saying the government must “repeal” changes made to PIP in 2017; an argument the High Court agreed with just before Christmas and one on which the DWP has now backed down.

So Pidcock has secured what’s known as a Westminster Hall debate on PIP, with evidence from people affected by the benefit. It will focus on claimants; Pidcock has received dozens of responses to a request for evidence. She told The Canary:

In my constituency, North West Durham, the highest volume of casework I receive by far is with issues associated with PIP. Constituents contact me on a range of difficulties: the long drawn-out process of claiming the benefit, including filling in paperwork, attending assessments, challenging decisions and making appeals.

Dogged by controversy

Pidcock also noted that many people living with mental health issues find the PIP process difficult:

I have found that people with mental health problems often find the process most challenging, due to the way the assessment is focused on physical conditions, albeit still not comprehensively. This has led to constituents contacting me who are in severe distress and some suicidal.

And scandals have dogged the process. These include:

  • 189,960 disabled people who previously got the DLA being denied PIP between 8 April 2013 and 31 July 2017. This was 21% of all disabled people who were reassessed by private outsourcing firms Atos and Capita.
  • Atos PIP assessors asking claimants they were reassessing: ‘why haven’t you killed yourself, yet?’
  • Between April 2017 and June 2017, 14,077 people winning their appeals against the DWP denying them PIP. This was 65% of all cases.
  • Also, between April 2015 and April 2017, 204,798 people winning their PIP appeals or mandatory reconsiderations against the DWP.

Pidcock: projecting the unheard voices

Pidcock believes that the government must start listening to people negatively affected by the process. She told The Canary:

I have met many people who feel utterly degraded by the process. I want their experiences to be heard and the Minister to listen and respond to them. When I asked for people to send me their experiences, just a day ago, the response was overwhelming and there have been some harrowing stories. It is clear the system is punishing and must be changed.

And with the government just recently having been found to be in violation of disabled people’s human rights for the fifth time in 20 months, Pidcock’s debate is needed more than ever.

Get Involved!

– Support Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC), fighting for disabled people’s rights.

– Check out more articles from The Canary on disability.

Featured image via Going Underground/YouTube

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed