BREAKING: The government just lost a major court case, giving 164,000 disabled people the best Christmas present

Theresa May High Court Fracking
Support us and go ad-free

The government has been defeated in a landmark court case against “discriminatory” legislation. And the victory could open the floodgates for up to 164,000 people to claim what is rightfully theirs.

A landmark win

The claimant, known as “RF”, brought the case against the government because she believes changes this year to Personal Independence Payments (PIP) will have a “significant negative impact” on her life. The case was specifically against Secretary of State for Work and Pensions David Gauke and changes to PIP regulations.

And the judges agreed with RF, ruling that the regulations were discriminatory and must be quashed. The ruling won’t come into force until the Court of Appeal decides whether the government can challenge the judgement.

Co-founder of Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC) Linda Burnip told The Canary:

We are pleased with the judgement. It will make a huge difference for thousands of disabled people with mental health support needs. We have to remember that this challenge is taken in a context when the UN… found systematic and grave violations of disabled people’s rights a year ago. And again in August it called the situation disabled people are in a ‘human catastrophe’. The UN specifically called on the government to repeal changes to PIP regulations because they breach our human rights under the Convention.

The Canary asked the Department for Work and Pensions for comment. A spokesperson said:

PIP replaced a system that was less generous for people with mental health conditions and is designed to consider the broader picture of how someone’s life is affected by their disability or health condition. We are disappointed the judgement fails to recognise that PIP provides more support to people with mental health conditions than ever before.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free


As The Canary previously reported, two tribunal judges ruled that the criteria for awarding PIP payments were insufficient, specifically for people who live with “overwhelming psychological distress” when travelling alone. But the government disagreed and introduced emergency legislation to block the judges’ legal rulings. Its own analysis showed that this would deny the enhanced rate of PIP to 164,000 people [pdf, p36]. And it was this legislation that RF was challenging.

Inclusion London said:

This is a hugely important case.  It challenges the discriminatory way the government treats Disabled people with mental health support needs.  The outcome can make a difference to thousands upon thousands of Disabled people.

And as Disability News Service (DNS) reported, RF’s solicitor Sara Lomri said:

[RF] has told me that losing enhanced PIP mobility means she will not be able to get the support she needs to travel. This will have a huge impact on her ability to participate in society and her independence.

RF also argued that the rule breached Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights, on the grounds of “unjustifiable discrimination”. This is because the government said that:

People who cannot carry out a journey because of a visual or cognitive impairment are likely to need more support than someone who experiences psychological distress when they undertake a journey, for example as a result of social phobia or anxiety.

In other words, the government is claiming that people living with mental health issues are in less need of support than those with a physical disability.

The government in chaos

But now, this has been effectively quashed, although the government will likely appeal the decision. For the time being, though, 164,000 people have been given a Christmas present they probably weren’t expecting. And Theresa May’s government has got another major headache coming in the new year.

This article was updated at 3:40pm on Thursday 21 December to reflect a statement from the Department for Work and Pensions.

Get Involved

– Support DPAC and the Mental Health Resistance Network.

Featured image via Flickr/Flickr

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed