UK government slammed in the High Court for failing to consider the rights of Muslims in detention

Barbed Wire

The UK government failed to consider the rights of Muslim detainees in Brook House immigration detention centre, ruled the High Court on 1 February. Mr Rahman and Mr Hussein, represented by my firm* Duncan Lewis Solicitors, took the UK government to court after it forced them to offer sunrise (fajr) and sunset (maghrib) prayers in their cells next to open toilets.

Our client Mr Rahman also told the court that he found the experience of using the unscreened toilet in front of his cellmates “excruciating and humiliating“.

Brook House made headlines in September, when BBC Panorama aired undercover footage of detention officers verbally and physically abusing detainees. The UK government outsources the running of the centre to private security firm G4S.

Degrading” prayer conditions for Muslims 

The High Court Judge, Mr Justice Holman, was candid and unflinching in his judgment:

I accept that having to pray within three metres of an exposed and open lavatory pan, with no seats or lids, especially one which other people have recently used, could feel degrading.

Mr Justice Holman found that these conditions interfered with the rights of Muslim detainees to practise their faith. He rejected the UK government’s argument that this interference was “trivial”.

The blunt truth

In making the ruling, the High Court Judge referred frequently to a statement of Imam Zeeshan Qayum. Mr Qayum is the Head of Religious Affairs for the Gatwick detention centres. The imam told the court that prayer near a toilet is “highly discouraged” in Islam, acceptable only in “extreme circumstances”.

Read on...

The UK government had originally obtained the imam’s pivotal evidence themselves. In a bizarre twist, however, the government tried to walk away from the statement. Mr Justice Holman was having none of it:

As the [UK government] had herself produced it, and it is signed and dated and contains statement of truth, I see no reason why I should not rely upon it, and I do.

Mr Justice Holman concluded that the UK government had ‘indirectly discriminated’ against Muslim detainees. The “blunt truth and reality”, the judge said, “is that the Secretary of State for the Home Department has never previously thought about differential or discriminatory effect [of such detention conditions] on practicing Muslims.”

The High Court also ruled that the UK government had unlawfully permitted smoking in “enclosed or substantially enclosed” areas. The UK government had argued that this approach was “pragmatic”. Mr Justice Holman held that the approach was an unlawful contravention of smoking regulations. The judge reflected damningly that “pragmatism” here was “simply a euphemism for knowingly evading the law”.

Tory mutiny

This High Court judgment is timely. The Conservatives are finding themselves increasingly isolated on the issue of immigration detention. The UK is the only country in the EU not to place a time limit on detention. Labour and the Liberal Democrats have pledged to do away with indefinite detention, and the Green Party has vowed to do away with the system altogether. There are rumblings of dissent even among the Conservatives. Two former Conservative cabinet ministers have now indicated that they would vote to end the current UK detention system.

This judgment will not bring down the detention system. But our clients have landed one more arrow into the UK government’s rotten shield, and it is beginning to crack.

* Patrick Page is a senior caseworker in the immigration and public law team at Duncan Lewis Solicitors.

Get Involved!

– Support Liberty.

Write to your MP calling for an urgent improvement in immigration detention conditions.

– Join The Canary so we can keep holding the powerful to account.

Featured image (for illustration) via Flickr  – Jobs for Felons Hub

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed