Three politicians with disabilities have launched legal action against the government over its failure to restore the access to elected office fund.
The fund was set up in 2012 under the coalition government. It offered grants of up to £40,000 to people with disabilities to enable them to meet the additional costs of standing for elected office. The money covered costs such as paying for carers, transport or sign language interpreters.
Closed, under review
The report will be completed this month, when final claims have been settled for candidates who stood in the May 2015 General Election and Local Authority elections.
Still under review…
Over a year later, in September 2016, and with no sign of the report, Green MP Caroline Lucas asked a similar question. She was told:
An evaluation of the pilot fund is currently being undertaken and will be published when an announcement about the future of the fund is made in due course.
Not ready yet…
Read on...Support us and go ad-free
Closure is “unreasonable”
Now three politicians with disabilities are taking legal action against the government. They say the closure of the fund is:
…unreasonable, in breach of legitimate expectations, constitutes unequal treatment and is contrary to the requirements of the Equality Act 2010.
Green Party candidate Simeon Hart stood for parliament in 2015 after the fund was closed. He said:
As a Deaf candidate I had to pay for a British Sign Language interpreter to accompany me whilst campaigning, sometimes up to 15 hours a day.
I set up a crowdfund online but this only raised a fraction of the money I needed, so I was at a massive disadvantage.
Having a disability can mean additional financial barriers but that should not block us from taking part in the democratic process.
Labour’s Emily Brothers and Liberal Democrat David Buxton are also part of the legal action. Brothers also stood for parliament in 2015. She said:
It’s absurd that the fund has been closed for longer than it was open.
There are only five MPs in parliament with a disability and to be representative, there should be at least 123 of us.
Don’t mention the fund
Yet in its response to the latest question, the government completely fails to mention the fund. It’s no wonder that politicians with disabilities are resorting to law.
– Sign the petition to restore the fund.
– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.
featured image via sjiong, Wikimedia Commons/Emily AppleSupport us and go ad-free
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.