Robert Peston gets totally schooled after his latest attack on Jeremy Corbyn

Robert Peston and Jeremy Corbyn

A British journalist totally schooled Robert Peston after his latest attack on Jeremy Corbyn. ITV‘s political editor tried to suggest that the Labour leader’s clarification about his party’s antisemitism code of conduct was “incendiary”. But, as Mehdi Hasan pointed out, anyone with even the slightest understanding of what Corbyn refers to “wouldn’t find any word” of it problematic.

IHRA definition

Labour’s National Executive Committee (NEC) adopted all the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) accompanying examples to its antisemitism definition on 4 September. A spokesperson confirmed:

The NEC has today adopted all of the IHRA examples of antisemitism, in addition to the IHRA definition which Labour adopted in 2016, alongside a statement which ensures this will not in any way undermine freedom of expression on Israel or the rights of Palestinians.

Corbyn offered his own clarification about antisemitism, racism and protecting freedom of expression on Israel and Palestine during the NEC session. Peston, however, appeared to take issue with one particular section of it:

So, according to Peston, Corbyn’s assertion that people should be allowed to hold Israel to the same standards and international laws as other countries is “incendiary”. Meanwhile, describing Israel, its laws or the circumstances of its foundation as racist is also “incendiary”, ITV‘s political editor suggests.

Not a clue

Unfortunately for Peston, Hasan swiftly pointed out the obvious:

The journalist at the Intercept wasn’t alone in doing so either:

Take your pick

There’s numerous evidence to back up the “truisms” included in Corbyn’s statement, including:

  • The UN partition plan establishing the state of Israel (on 56.47% of then-Palestine) envisioned a mixed society made up of Jews and Arabs, and vice versa, although to a lesser degree, in what remained Palestine. In practice, militants carried out large scale ethnic cleansing in 1948 when forming the state, resulting in Israel seizing control of 78% of the land.
  • Israel has maintained an over 50-year-long military occupation of what remains of Palestine. That means that each and every government over that period has denied Palestinians the rights afforded to them by the UN, in particular the right to self determination.
  • The current Israeli government recently legalised its racism by passing a nation state law. Among other things, this law gives Jewish people an “exclusive” right to self-determination in the country. It’s regarded by many as a law that firmly proves Israel is an “apartheid state“.
  • Israel routinely breaks international law. Its occupation is illegal. Its settlement building is illegal. Meanwhile, historian Norman Finkelstein argues that Israel’s use of force in Gaza contravenes international law. It justifies force by saying it’s in self defence. But Finkelstein says Israel has no right to self defence against Palestinians because it’s an illegally-occupying force. On the contrary, Palestinians have the right to defend themselves against the illegal occupier.


In short, Peston’s characterisation of Corbyn’s clarification as “incendiary” is baseless. It’s not incendiary to state the truth. But critics of the IHRA full definition of antisemitism have argued that it could be used to quash condemnation of Israel.

Peston’s attack on Corbyn over this will do nothing to quell fears that that’s exactly what its advocates were after all along.

Get Involved!

Take action with the Palestine Solidarity Campaign.

Join The Canary if you appreciate the work we do.

Featured image via Rwendland/Wikimedia and Chatham House/Wikimedia

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed