Robert Peston gets totally schooled after his latest attack on Jeremy Corbyn

Robert Peston and Jeremy Corbyn
Tracy Keeling

A British journalist totally schooled Robert Peston after his latest attack on Jeremy Corbyn. ITV‘s political editor tried to suggest that the Labour leader’s clarification about his party’s antisemitism code of conduct was “incendiary”. But, as Mehdi Hasan pointed out, anyone with even the slightest understanding of what Corbyn refers to “wouldn’t find any word” of it problematic.

IHRA definition

Labour’s National Executive Committee (NEC) adopted all the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) accompanying examples to its antisemitism definition on 4 September. A spokesperson confirmed:

The NEC has today adopted all of the IHRA examples of antisemitism, in addition to the IHRA definition which Labour adopted in 2016, alongside a statement which ensures this will not in any way undermine freedom of expression on Israel or the rights of Palestinians.

Corbyn offered his own clarification about antisemitism, racism and protecting freedom of expression on Israel and Palestine during the NEC session. Peston, however, appeared to take issue with one particular section of it:

So, according to Peston, Corbyn’s assertion that people should be allowed to hold Israel to the same standards and international laws as other countries is “incendiary”. Meanwhile, describing Israel, its laws or the circumstances of its foundation as racist is also “incendiary”, ITV‘s political editor suggests.

Not a clue

Unfortunately for Peston, Hasan swiftly pointed out the obvious:

The journalist at the Intercept wasn’t alone in doing so either:

Take your pick

There’s numerous evidence to back up the “truisms” included in Corbyn’s statement, including:

  • The UN partition plan establishing the state of Israel (on 56.47% of then-Palestine) envisioned a mixed society made up of Jews and Arabs, and vice versa, although to a lesser degree, in what remained Palestine. In practice, militants carried out large scale ethnic cleansing in 1948 when forming the state, resulting in Israel seizing control of 78% of the land.
  • Israel has maintained an over 50-year-long military occupation of what remains of Palestine. That means that each and every government over that period has denied Palestinians the rights afforded to them by the UN, in particular the right to self determination.
  • The current Israeli government recently legalised its racism by passing a nation state law. Among other things, this law gives Jewish people an “exclusive” right to self-determination in the country. It’s regarded by many as a law that firmly proves Israel is an “apartheid state“.
  • Israel routinely breaks international law. Its occupation is illegal. Its settlement building is illegal. Meanwhile, historian Norman Finkelstein argues that Israel’s use of force in Gaza contravenes international law. It justifies force by saying it’s in self defence. But Finkelstein says Israel has no right to self defence against Palestinians because it’s an illegally-occupying force. On the contrary, Palestinians have the right to defend themselves against the illegal occupier.


In short, Peston’s characterisation of Corbyn’s clarification as “incendiary” is baseless. It’s not incendiary to state the truth. But critics of the IHRA full definition of antisemitism have argued that it could be used to quash condemnation of Israel.

Peston’s attack on Corbyn over this will do nothing to quell fears that that’s exactly what its advocates were after all along.

Get Involved!

Take action with the Palestine Solidarity Campaign.

Join The Canary if you appreciate the work we do.

Featured image via Rwendland/Wikimedia and Chatham House/Wikimedia

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed

Tracy Keeling