The corporate media appears to be wilfully misrepresenting the no-confidence vote in Labour Friends of Israel (LFI) chair Joan Ryan MP. On 6 September, Ryan lost the non-binding vote by 94-92.
But there are serious reasons behind Ryan’s local Labour party voting to remove her as an MP.
Accused of fabricating a claim of antisemitism
Al-Jazeera documentary The Lobby exposed attempts to undermine Corbyn stemming from the Israeli embassy in London. Ryan has been accused of fabricating a claim of antisemitism after an undercover reporter filmed her calling a Labour member’s question antisemitic at the 2017 party conference:
Tonight Joan Ryan MP faces a vote of no confidence from her local party after making up a claim of anti-semitism against a Labour Party member and pro-Palestine activist.
Judge for yourself.
Read on...Support us and go ad-free
— Aaron Bastani (@AaronBastani) September 6, 2018
More recently, a letter from the Labour Friends of Israel (LFI) chair equated upholding Palestinian ‘right of return’ with antisemitism. Novara Media senior editor Ash Sarkar laid out the problem with that:
Joan Ryan in her letter to Jeremy Corbyn said that respecting Palestinian right of return for five million Palestinian refugees is itself a denial of the Jewish right of self-determination because it would no longer be a Jewish majority state. The question I would put to other people is do you think that’s antisemitism or do you think that’s respecting UN General Assembly resolution 194?
UN resolution 194 states that:
refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbours should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date
In the Al Jazeera documentary, the pro-Israel lobby group LFI admitted that it works “really closely” with the Israeli embassy “behind the scenes”.
Undermining Labour during 2017 general election
Ryan also undermined the Labour party during last year’s general election. Writing to voters in her constituency, the MP for Enfield North said:
I know from speaking to people around here that many who have previously voted Labour are thinking hard this time because, they tell me, they have more confidence in Theresa May as prime minister than they would have in Jeremy Corbyn.
The polls are all saying that the Conservative party will win a large majority, possibly with more MPs than they have ever had before. Realistically, no one thinks Theresa May will not be prime minister or that she will not have the majority she needs to negotiate Brexit.
In reality, Corbyn’s Labour removed May’s majority and increased Labour’s vote share by more than at any point since 1945.
No one votes for their local MP
In response to the no-confidence vote, Ryan echoed the establishment conspiracy theory that Corbyn supporters are mainly “Trots”, “Stalinists” and “Communists”.
So lost 92 to 94 votes hardly decisive victory and it never occurred to me that Trots Stalinists Communists and assorted hard left would gave confidence in me. I have none in them.
— Joan Ryan MP (@joanryanEnfield) September 6, 2018
Ryan also attempted to shift the emphasis onto her general constituency, rather than the local Labour party:
I will be out tomorrow morning working hard for the people of Enfield.
— Joan Ryan MP (@joanryanEnfield) September 6, 2018
The thing is, hardly anyone votes Labour because of their local MP. Just 6% of Labour votes chose red at the ballot box because of who their local MP is. 28% backed Labour because of the Corbyn-led manifesto, 15% in opposition to the Conservatives and 13% because of Corbyn himself.
Labour voters aren’t living in the clouds. People know that policy is decided nationally and individual MPs have little power in comparison. Most MPs are elected primarily on the back of Labour as a whole. So many argue that MPs should be democratically accountable to their local party.
The media appears to be wilfully misrepresenting no-confidence votes to protect pro-establishment MPs. But the permanent position of some Labour MPs may soon come to an end. At the Labour conference in late September, the party will vote on introducing ‘open selection’. This means that members would get to vote on who represents them in parliament, based on a one member, one vote, electoral system. That could well see the end of MPs such as Ryan who cannot win over the grassroots.
That’s called democracy, not deselection. And it cannot come soon enough.
– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.
– Read and support other independent media outlets:
Another Angry Voice, Media Diversified, Novara Media, Corporate Watch, Red Pepper, New Internationalist, Common Space, Media Lens, Bella Caledonia, Vox Political, Evolve Politics, Real Media, Reel News, STRIKE! magazine, The Bristol Cable, The Meteor, The Skwawkbox, Salford Star, The Ferret.
Featured image via Al Jazeera/ YouTube
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?