The BBC put out an infographic ahead of its first Question Time of the season on 13 September. Clearly, the public broadcaster wanted to show potential critics how balanced its panellists are.
But the BBC‘s pre-emptive defence went down like a lead balloon with much of the British public. Especially as the programme didn’t live up to the broadcaster’s portrayal of itself.
Nothing to see here
The BBC News press team alerted people to Question Time‘s return after its summer break on 13 September. But the public broadcaster noted that it “often” gets questions about its choice of panellists. So, it included an infographic to put those queries to bed:
Tonight at 22:45 @bbcquestiontime returns for a new series on @BBCOne. We often get questions about our panels so we’ve crunched the numbers and here’s a chart showing a breakdown of panellists since 2000. #bbcqt pic.twitter.com/54HSlAwHLU
— BBC News Press Team (@BBCNewsPR) September 13, 2018
Unfortunately for the BBC, its choice of panellists for the very first show of the season didn’t exactly bolster its claim of balance:
The BBC's idea of 'political balance' is absolutely farcical:
1.) Right-wing Conservative MP.
2.) Right-wing anti-Corbyn Labour MP.
3.) Right-wing Tory Donor and multi-millionaire businessman.
4.) Left-Wing Corbyn Supporter.
5.) Right-wing Daily Mail hack.#BBCQT pic.twitter.com/oUgPQv7j7e
— Evolve Politics (@evolvepolitics) September 12, 2018
This sort of panel line-up isn’t an anomaly either. It chose almost exactly the same ‘balanced’ panel in May, just with different people taking up the left-wing vs right-wing positions:
A record four Tories on the upcoming #BBCqt
Akala is pretty Left-Wing but apart from him they have the most Right-Wing Labour MP as well as three official Tories. pic.twitter.com/9Zcna135uI
— The Pileus (@thepileus) May 9, 2018
Wait a minute
But people didn’t only take issue with the BBC‘s choice of panel after its Twitter message. They raised numerous problems with its defence. Some questioned the date range it chose:
Because that would support the hypothesis that the #bbcbias exists.
By adding in lot of additional data from prior to that shift it disguises this.
— Jon Hannah ? #FBPE #The760000 #Peoplesvote (@JCHannah77) September 13, 2018
My thoughts exactly. Have they had to go that far back to get to the point where the SNP would be ahead of UKIP?
— tom murphy (@themadmurph) September 13, 2018
Others criticised the BBC‘s choice not to acknowledge that “other panellists” often have left/right leanings of their own:
— The Agitator (@UKDemockery) September 13, 2018
Chart of limited use given 36% panelists 'other'. Need breakdown in terms their politics, particularly Brexit. The 'other panelists' regularly included right-wing columnists/lobbyists such as Farage, Hopkins, Banks, Tim Martin, Andrews, Dyson, Hartley-B, Oakeshott, Perrins etc
— Trish #PeoplesVote (@trish_sweeney00) September 13, 2018
Meanwhile, people also called out the broadcaster for brushing over the fact that Labour representatives can differ in important ways:
Your carefully created chart means very little. Most of your Labour since 2015 are carefully selected Blairites, you went back to 2000 to avoid the huge slice that UKIP would otherwise have taken, and 'other panellists' usually includes RW think tanks. We're not fooled. pic.twitter.com/Pug996aSDk
— I Am Nothing ? #GTTO (@AKA_Porlek) September 13, 2018
Of course, with the amount of discussion Question Time has given to Brexit and Nigel Farage, that came up too:
Now do it again for "Pro-Brexit" and "Anti-Brexit". And again for "UKIP MEPs" versus "Any Other MEPs". And then again for "Compulsively Lying Populists" versus "People Who Have The First Idea What They Are Talking About".
— Anti-Brexit Alien (@LennieMerrick1) September 13, 2018
"often get questions" my shiny metal ass. You're trying to defend yourselves from people who've sussed your game & given the number of Farage appearances I'd say you're massaging the figs by putting him down as "Other Panelists", this won't cut it coz we know your game now BBC.
— Roger Anderson (@Rog_Anderson) September 13, 2018
When did Nigel Farage change his name to 36% ?
— Craig Cockburn (@siliconglen) September 13, 2018
Show us the goods
A number of people are now asking for the BBC to release the data it used to create the infographic. So, its attempt to answer the questions it “often” gets about panels has just given rise to more. That’s probably not the result the BBC hoped for. Or, as one Twitter user put it:
That went well. pic.twitter.com/YYmYgi0X9W
— Stephen Kinsella (@Kinsellas) September 13, 2018
But then, the BBC shouldn’t really have expected anything less. Especially not when it chooses a predominantly right-wing panel after posting ‘proof’ of its impartiality.
– Join The Canary if you appreciate the work we do.
Featured image via screengrab
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?