The barrister who said the DWP isn’t ‘waging war’ on the poor should have checked his tweet history

Iain Duncan Smith, Jolyon Maugham, and the DWP logo
John Shafthauer

On 23 September, the Centre for Labour and Social Studies (CLASS) shared a video of Owen Jones. In it, he said Iain Duncan Smith and the Conservative Party had “waged war” on the poor. The barrister Jolyon Maugham later said it was wrong to describe the government as ‘waging war’ on anyone:

There were several problems with his assertion. The one that really sticks out is that Maugham himself has – you guessed it – previously described the Tories as waging war on the electorate.


In the video for CLASS, Jones said:

like one man in Scotland, who’s half-paralysed – half-blind – could barely speak – found fit-for-work – the day after the letter arrived, he died. And his 13-year-old son wrote a letter to Iain Duncan Smith; the cruelty of that man.

Jones and CLASS are far from the only people to speak out about the Tories’ war on the poor and disabled. On 24 September, The Canary reported that the UN is opening its fifth investigation into the DWP. The UN has previously accused the DWP of “grave” and “systematic” violations of disabled people’s human rights.

Track record

It turned out Maugham is actually guilty of using the sort of rhetoric he’s now deriding:

Jones himself pulled Maugham up on this:

This captures a common feeling that’s developed in the past few years among those who’ve yet to feel austerity’s impact. Maugham is far from the worst for this, but there’s a constant suggestion that the problem isn’t austerity and its effects; the problem isn’t the Tories and their murderous policies – the problem is how people conduct themselves on Twitter.

This puts those affected by austerity in a double bind. On the one hand, the Tories are driving them to death. On the other hand, if they vent their rage, barristers, minor celebrities, and newspaper columnists will call them trolls who are ruining politics.

To many, it’s out of sight, out of mind. Before social media, it was easy to pretend the victims of politics were just statistics. Now that people are standing up and fighting against what the government is doing to them, the comfortable classes are just as disgusted by the rabble as they are by the Tory Party.


People had several criticisms of Maugham’s comment:


Sometimes it’s right to criticise rhetoric. But we’re at a point now where one report predicted that Tory and Lib Dem austerity killed 120,000 people and counting. So how does Maugham think we should describe austerity?

Somehow, I don’t think you’re going to fit ‘STOP THE TORIES FROM VISITING PROFOUNDLY WRONG CONSEQUENCES OF THE FINANCIAL CRISIS ON THOSE WHO DON’T DESERVE IT, PLEASE’ on a placard. And that’s even if it was a consequence, rather than a choice to transfer wealth from the poor to the rich.

Having a clear message that cuts through is important. The unavoidable issue is that people are dying. If you don’t think 120,000 dead is a ‘war’, that’s fine; you don’t have a clue what’s going to stop those people dying, though, so step aside and let people with bigger concerns than language do the work.

Get Involved!

Read more about CLASS – the Centre for Labour and Social Studies.

Read more from The Canary about the DWP and its ‘grave and systematic’ abuses against human rights.

– Support the blogs Universal Credit Sufferer and The Poor Side of Life. Also, follow I was a JSA claimantBENEFITS NEWS and Paula Peters on Twitter. Get involved with Disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC), fighting for disabled people’s rights.

– Check out articles on austerity and just look around you to make your own mind up.

– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.

Featured image via Brian Minkoff – Wikimedia / Jolyon Maugham – YouTube

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed

John Shafthauer