A Labour MP called for a general strike and the media reaction was wild

Laura Smith at The World Transformed
Glen Black

On 25 September, Labour MP Laura Smith said a general strike might be necessary if a general election isn’t called. And the statement stirred up a storm of reactions in the media.

‘Topple this government’

Speaking at The World Transformed, an event organised by Momentum running beside the Labour conference in Liverpool, Smith said:

We must topple this cruel and callous Tory government as soon as we can. And if we can’t get a general election, we should organise with our brothers and sisters in the trade unions to bring an end to this government with a general strike.

The crowd stood to applaud the Crewe and Nantwich MP, as did shadow justice secretary Richard Burgon.

Other Labour officials immediately came down on Smith’s statement. Deputy leader Tom Watson said on Radio 4′s Today that Smith got “carried away” and her call was “not particularly helpful”. And shadow business secretary Rebecca Long-Bailey said a general strike is not Labour policy.

Predictably, establishment and right-wing media jumped at the news.

United opposition

Several outlets ridiculed Smith and her speech. The Spectator said it was a “socialist slip-up”. The Daily Mail said it was an “extraordinary call to break the law”. Meanwhile, Westmonster described it as “bonkers far-left rhetoric”. And the Daily Mirror said it was the “stupidest thing” said at the Labour conference.

Many national papers focused on division among Labour officials. The Sun said figures within the party had “sought to distance themselves” from Smith’s call. The Express, meanwhile, said the whole party had “sought to distance itself” from the remark. And talkRADIO attempted to paint Burgon as a hypocrite in a video asking him about his reaction.

Above all, most outlets made reference to the ‘failed’ general strike of 1926.

General strike success

Coal miners refusing lower pay for more working hours led to a general strike in May 1926. It lasted nine days and ended without a win after the government held meetings with the Trades Union Congress (TUC). This was widely regarded as a failure, something Watson said on Radio 4′s Today.

But the general strike was a failure of union leaders, not of the strike itself. A reflection written in the 1940s by union organiser Tom Brown said:

The strike failed only because it was called off by the trade union leaders and the workers had not learned to distrust those leaders sufficiently.

The willingness of workers to continue struggling even after the TUC turned tail showed this. As one socialist writer put it:

The ruling class had spent hundreds of millions of pounds, yet with all the resources at their disposal they could never have defeated the general strike but for the treachery of the TUC leaders.

News following Smith’s call has painted the 1926 strike as a disaster for the working class. But it was only a disaster for union bureaucrats. Many amongst the working class were empowered by the strike, despite not winning concessions. And at the following election in 1929, Labour took office.

Not fooled

Some reactions on Twitter have even suggested a general strike would hurt the working class most. Not everyone believed this rhetoric, though, including Owen Jones:

It’s in the interests of those with power to make the idea of a general strike seem ridiculous. Even many union bosses were against the 1926 general strike. And as defenders of power, it’s no surprise that news outlets were quick to deflate Smith’s remarks.

The prospect of a general strike seems unlikely. But it wouldn’t be the disaster those with power would have you believe.

Get Involved!

Learn about a viable model for a general strike today from Solidarity Federation.

Read more about the 2018 Labour conference at The Canary.

Featured image via Feedimo News/YouTube

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed

Glen Black