The phrase ‘anti-business’ once had some political capital. The majority of people weren’t fighting a daily battle to survive against poverty and precarious work; many assumed they had businesses to thank for that.
Now, when people think of ‘business’, they imagine Amazon owner Jeff Bezos wrapping his hands around their neck and laughing as he squeezes the last remaining pennies out of their bank account.
As such, the idea of being opposed to some businesses isn’t all that odd. Unless you’re still living in the bubble, obviously:
— Paul Mason (@paulmasonnews) September 27, 2018
This is why Labour’s suggestion that companies should treat their employees as human beings has caused something of a stink.
A gaggle of politicians, wealthy business owners, and newspaper columnists discussed the proposal on BBC Breakfast. They’d picked these guests to make sure there was a clear balance between those who benefit from capitalism-run-amok and those who lick these people’s arses.
The widely hated Mike Ashley commented:
They’re taking the piss now – everyone knows workers are just shaven chimpanzees.
Columnist Dan Hodges confirmed this assessment, claiming to have seen some of them up close:
Labour conference cabbie check: “I like Jeremy. He’s ordinary, not like other politicians. The press say all these terrible things about him being racist. He’s not”. I’m walking now…
— (((Dan Hodges))) (@DPJHodges) September 24, 2018
Brave new world
If businesses like Amazon and Uber are allowed to carry on abusing their workers, then being ‘anti-business’ will be no more controversial than being ‘anti-litter’ or ‘anti-Al-Qaeda’.
It’s in the interest of most businesses that the worst companies are brought in line now. Although, if we have to eat Jeff Bezos before things change, then so be it.
– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.
Featured image via Daily Sunny – Flickr [IMAGE WAS ALTERED]
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?