The Duchess of Cambridge has resumed her royal duties after five months of maternity leave. On 2 September, she was reported as ‘returning to work’, along with photographs of her at a wildlife garden in London.
The Telegraph decided to publish an article praising the short period of leave. The article claimed shorter maternity leave “should be normal” for everyone. Of course, the commoners disagreed.
Many pointed out that it’s much easier to take a shorter period of maternity leave when you have extra paid help:
like fucking hell, five months is actually a pretty excessive maternity leave for someone whose daily routine involves handing her baby over to the highly trained professionals as she pops out for a couple of hours to wave while someone else plants a tree.
— Another Angry Woman (@stavvers) October 2, 2018
How about the royals donate a Nanny to all working class families so that this can be reality.
— Bazarito (@BazaritoDorito) October 2, 2018
ummm, I don't know if using a duchess, a member of one of the richest royal families in the world who undoubtedly has support staff is the best example for advocating a shorter maternity leave https://t.co/x1wr8JhinF
— Bakhti Nishanov (@b_nishanov) October 2, 2018
In particular, people are wary of describing the Duchess’s royal duties as “work”. Along with the fact that the taxpayer is still footing the bill for the royal family:
She doesn’t work and we pay for her life and rent and bills so every day has been maternity leave for Kate since 2011 go away https://t.co/nIWAOne101
— Congolesa ‘My Birthday Is Nov 13th’ Rice (@judeinlondon2) October 2, 2018
I'm glad she's feeling recovered enough to wave at people from expensive cars again, but most women do not have armies of staff to help them out with the exhausting work of motherhood. And most women have, you know, actual fucking jobs. https://t.co/7fODgHPFNf
— Eleanor Penny (@eleanorkpenny) October 2, 2018
Yes it's true everyone should have shorter maternity leave because millionaire leeches without real jobs can do it. https://t.co/3SbBSQrWTi
— hey kid, stop all the tweetin'! (@luapula) October 2, 2018
Some people were angry at the suggestion that taking shorter maternity leave is feminist and empowering. The Telegraph is clearly unaware of the struggles of most working mothers:
Also breastfeeding. Plenty of jobs make breastfeeding difficult, because there are no facilities for expressing and storing breastmilk at work. Do we want breastfeeding rates to plummet in this country?
— Dr Lena Immodest Wahlgren-Smith (@lwahlgrensmith) October 3, 2018
The whole debate has provoked criticism of the Telegraph. And people have commented on how out of touch it is with most people:
Absolutely agree with you!! Maternity leave is brief enough, paid maternity leave even briefer, and properly paid maternity leave barely exists…and when childcare costs all too often negate going to work…well, but the Torygraph don't care about all that do they…ARGH!
— Kate Lovell (@katejlovell) October 2, 2018
The #Torygraph has taken leave of its senses here. The elite really are determined to have everyone dropping dead of exhaustion at their desks, so the state can avoid having to pay us our pensions #DuchessofCambridge
— Sparkle #DWPCrimes #JC4PM #GTTO (@StarSparkle_UK) October 2, 2018
Maternity leave is a hard-earned right which is vital in helping women get into work. And the circumstances of every woman who goes on maternity leave vary a great deal.
So to suggest that shorter maternity leave “should be normal” is bad enough. But to do so using the example of a royal whose childcare is funded by taxpayers? Well, that’s just plain stupid. Although, can we really expect any better from the Torygraph?
– Check out and support this campaign for extended maternity leave by mums of premature babies.
– Support The Canary if you appreciate the work we do.
Featured image via Youtube
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?