No first-round winner
According to Brazil’s electoral system, a candidate must win over 50% of the vote to become president in the first round. Therefore, Bolsonaro must face his nearest rival, Fernando Haddad, in a second round of voting. This will take place on 28 October.
Bolsonaro: the “fascist, racist, chauvinist and homophobic candidate”
Bolsonaro is a controversial figure, who has a developed a reputation for extremism and offensiveness. He has praised Brazil’s military dictatorship, for example, which murdered hundreds of people. He has also made sexist, racist and homophobic remarks. A recently released manifesto signed by Noam Chomsky and other intellectuals and activists described Bolsonaro as a “fascist, racist, chauvinist and homophobic candidate, one who calls for violence and armed repression”.
Further division expected in the coming weeks
Both the result and the second round of voting look set to plunge Latin America’s most populous nation and largest economy into further division. Opinion polls show that “in a second round the two candidates would be tied.” Monica de Bolle, the director of Latin American Studies at Johns Hopkins University, said:
The next few weeks are just going to be crazy. The country is just going to divide even more.
Main left-wing candidate disqualified weeks before the election
The PT campaign took a big knock with the disqualification of popular ex-president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. In September, a court upheld a controversial conviction against him on alleged corruption charges, meaning he was ineligible to stand. Some supporters view the ruling as politically motivated.
Haddad was widely considered a last-minute replacement, and was thus largely unknown before the electoral campaign outside São Paulo, where he served as mayor.
Featured image via YouTube
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?